Tax reform and redistribution for a better recovery

Author(s):  
Felix FitzRoy ◽  
Jim Jin

A regressive tax system and welfare cuts under ideological austerity have generated growing poverty and inequality in the UK and US. Failures in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting deep recession have the greatest impact on the poorest and most vulnerable, exacerbating poverty and inequality. In contrast to this depressing history, we show in detail that a better recovery in the UK requires a radical tax reform and a universal basic income, combined with a Green New Deal for full employment and a low-carbon economy, employee self-determination and economic democracy to eliminate exploitation and establish social justice.

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Fankhauser ◽  
David Kennedy ◽  
Jim Skea

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 1865-1876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulus T. Aditjandra ◽  
Thomas H. Zunder ◽  
Dewan M.Z. Islam ◽  
Eero Vanaale

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 865-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL EKINS ◽  
GABRIAL ANANDARAJAH ◽  
NEIL STRACHAN

Energy Policy ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 3067-3077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Α.S. Dagoumas ◽  
T.S. Barker

Author(s):  
Frances Drake

Fracking in the UK has yet to reach full industrial development but it is still subject to significant opposition. This study uses Beck’s Risk Society theory and anti-politics to examine the views voiced by opponents to fracking in Yorkshire, England. A qualitative approach was used; local newspaper reports were evaluated alongside semi-structured interviews with protesters to provide a thematic analysis. Although there are signs of post-materialist concerns with the environment these issues did not dominate the discussion. Scientists were not held responsible for the risks involved in fracking. Instead economic greediness of politicians and austerity measures were perceived as putting the environment and people’s health at risk. Interviewees thought fossil fuel energy production was economically advantaged over more sustainable energy and jobs in the low carbon economy. Protesters’ trust in politicians had been eroded but faith in democracy remained. It is suggested a citizen-led deliberative approach to all the concerns raised, not simply those relating to scientific risk, might achieve some level of resolution over fracking in the UK.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-308
Author(s):  
Emily Webster

Abstract Over the last several years there has been increasing recognition and acceptance of the threat that climate change poses to global financial stability and the concurrent need for corporations to identify and account for both climate risks and their impacts on the environment. This has resulted in the emergence of climate risk disclosure (CRD) as a voluntary standard as well as movement on the domestic level to introduce mandatory CRD, demonstrated by the introduction of CRD framework legislation in France. This article conducts a comparative analysis of France and the UK—countries that are adopting divergent methods of legal development towards CRD—to analyse the potential of CRD as a policy tool to aid towards climate change mitigation and the transition to a low-carbon economy, and evaluate how effectively this is being achieved in practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document