Future-Proof Planning of Foreign Plants

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
Heiko Barth
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
Heiko Barth
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lowe ◽  
A. Bundy ◽  
D. McLean

Author(s):  
HELEN LOWE ◽  
MICHAL PECHOUCEK ◽  
ALAN BUNDY

Configuration is a complex task generally involving varying measures of constraint satisfaction, optimization, and the management of soft constraints. Although many successful systems have been developed, these are often difficult to maintain and to generalize in rapidly changing domains. In this paper, we consider building intelligent knowledge-based systems with maintainability well to the fore in our requirements for such systems. We introduce two case studies: the initial proof of concept, which was in the domain of computer configuration, and a further field-tested study, the configuration of compressors. Central to our approach is the use of the proof planning technique, and the clean separation of different kinds of knowledge: factual, heuristic, and strategic.


10.29007/5wpt ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewen Maclean ◽  
Andrew Ireland ◽  
Lucas Dixon ◽  
Robert Atkey

We present a technique for refining incorrect or insufficiently strong loop invariants in correctness proofs for imperative programs. We rely on previous work [16] in combining program analysis and Proof Planning, and exploit IsaPlanner’s use of meta-variables and goal-naming to generate correct loop invariants. We present a simple example in detail and show how this scales to more complex problems.


1999 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Melis ◽  
Jörg Siekmann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document