High Definition versus Standard Colonoscopy: Adenoma Detection in an Average Risk Screening Population in Clinical Practice

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. S568-S569
Author(s):  
Deep Adhikari ◽  
Elise Jacques ◽  
Curuchi Anand
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
High Definition ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Screening Population ◽  
Standard Colonoscopy

IBD Patients Have a Lower Adenoma Detection Rate Than the Average-Risk Screening Population at a University Medical Center

2014 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. S614
Author(s):  
Steven Zeddun ◽  
Abdullah Al-shahrani ◽  
Vikesh Khanijow ◽  
Lakshmi Lattimer ◽  
Timoth Dougherty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Rate ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Screening Population

scholarly journals High Definition Colonoscopy Combined with i-SCAN Imaging Technology Is Superior in the Detection of Adenomas and Advanced Lesions Compared to High Definition Colonoscopy Alone

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik A. Bowman ◽  
Patrick R. Pfau ◽  
Arnab Mitra ◽  
Mark Reichelderfer ◽  
Deepak V. Gopal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
White Light ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Screening Colonoscopy ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
High Definition ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
Endoscopic Screening ◽  
White Light Endoscopy ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Advanced Adenomas

Background. Improved detection of adenomatous polyps using i-SCAN has mixed results in small studies. Utility of i-SCAN as a primary surveillance modality for colorectal cancer screening during colonoscopy is uncertain. Aim. Comparing high definition white light endoscopy (HDWLE) to i-SCAN in their ability to detect adenomas during colonoscopy. Methods. Prospective cohort study of 1936 average risk patients who had a screening colonoscopy at an ambulatory procedure center. Patients underwent colonoscopy with high definition white light endoscopy withdrawal versus i-SCAN withdrawal during endoscopic screening exam. Primary outcome measurement was adenoma detection rate for i-SCAN versus high definition white light endoscopy. Secondary measurements included polyp size, pathology, and morphology. Results. 1007 patients underwent colonoscopy with i-SCAN and 929 with HDWLE. 618 adenomas were detected in the i-SCAN group compared to 402 in the HDWLE group p<0.01. More advanced adenomas (≥10 mm) were found by i-SCAN, 79 versus 47 p=0.021 and based upon histology alone 37 versus 18 p=0.028. Conclusions. i-SCAN detected significantly more adenomas and advanced adenomas compared to high definition white light endoscopy.

Isolated Small Right-Sided Hyperplastic Polyps Confer Higher Rates of Synchronous Advanced Neoplasia Compared to an Average Risk Screening Population

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S540
Author(s):  
Thayer Hamoudah ◽  
Karen Ma ◽  
Marcus Juan L. Esteban ◽  
Waqas Hayat ◽  
Brett Mahon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Average Risk ◽  
Hyperplastic Polyps ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Advanced Neoplasia ◽  
Screening Population

scholarly journals Does deep sedation with propofol affect adenoma detection rates in average risk screening colonoscopy exams?

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selvi Thirumurthi ◽  
Gottumukkala S Raju ◽  
Mala Pande ◽  
Joseph Ruiz ◽  
Richard Carlson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Sedation ◽  
Screening Colonoscopy ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rates

scholarly journals Prevalence of Proximal Serrated Polyps and Conventional Adenomas in an Asymptomatic Average-Risk Screening Population

Gut and Liver ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Kyun Lee ◽  
Youn Wha Kim ◽  
Jae-Jun Shim ◽  
Jae Young Jang
Keyword(s):  
Average Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Serrated Polyps ◽  
Screening Population
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document