scholarly journals Model Predictive Control: Taking the Idea of Artificial Pancreas a Step forward for Diabetes Management

Author(s):  
Rahmat Ullah Safdar ◽  
◽  
Muwahida Liaquat ◽  
Syed M. Tahir Zaidi ◽  
Muhammad Usman Akram
2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1470-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Toffanin ◽  
Mirko Messori ◽  
Federico Di Palma ◽  
Giuseppe De Nicolao ◽  
Claudio Cobelli ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 105-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitri Boiroux ◽  
Vladimír Bátora ◽  
Morten Hagdrup ◽  
Sabrina Lyngbye Wendt ◽  
Niels Kjølstad Poulsen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (27) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitri Boiroux ◽  
Vladimír Bátora ◽  
Zeinab Mahmoudi ◽  
John Bagterp Jørgensen

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 1091-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalo Magni ◽  
Marco Forgione ◽  
Chiara Toffanin ◽  
Chiara Dalla Man ◽  
Boris Kovatchev ◽  
...  

Background: The technological advancements in subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump delivery systems have paved the way to clinical testing of artificial pancreas devices. The experience derived by clinical trials poses technological challenges to the automatic control expert, the most notable being the large interpatient and intrapatient variability and the inherent uncertainty of patient information. Methods: A new model predictive control (MPC) glucose control system is proposed. The starting point is an MPC algorithm applied in 20 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) subjects. Three main changes are introduced: individualization of the ARX model used for prediction; synthesis of the MPC law on top of the open-loop basal/bolus therapy; and a run-to-run approach for implementing day-by-day tuning of the algorithm. In order to individualize the ARX model, a sufficiently exciting insulin profile is imposed by splitting the premeal bolus into two smaller boluses (40% and 60%) injected 30 min before and 30 min after the meal. Results: The proposed algorithm was tested on 100 virtual subjects extracted from an in silico T1DM population. The trial simulates 44 consecutive days, during which the patient receives breakfast, lunch, and dinner each day. For 10 days, meals are multiplied by a random variable uniformly distributed in [0.5, 1.5], while insulin delivery is based on nominal meals. Moreover, for 10 days, either a linear increase or decrease of insulin sensitivity (±25% of nominal value) is introduced. Conclusions: The ARX model identification procedure offers an automatic tool for patient model individualization. The run-to-run approach is an effective way to auto-tune the aggressiveness of the closed-loop control law, is robust to meal variation, and is also capable of adapting the regulator to slow parameter variations, e.g., on insulin sensitivity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 2600-2607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankush Chakrabarty ◽  
Elizabeth Healey ◽  
Dawei Shi ◽  
Stamatina Zavitsanou ◽  
Francis J. Doyle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document