scholarly journals Universalism in social care for older people in Finland – weak and still getting weaker

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Teppo Kröger
2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
SALLY JACOBS ◽  
CHENGQIU XIE ◽  
SIOBHAN REILLY ◽  
JANE HUGHES ◽  
DAVID CHALLIS

ABSTRACTIn common with other developed countries at the end of the 20th century, modernising public services was a priority of the United Kingdom (UK) Labour administration after its election in 1997. The modernisation reforms in health and social care exemplified their approach to public policy. The authors were commissioned to examine the evidence base for the modernisation of social care services for older people, and for this purpose conducted a systematic review of the relevant peer-reviewed UK research literature published from 1990 to 2001. Publications that reported descriptive, analytical, evaluative, quantitative and qualitative studies were identified and critically appraised under six key themes of modernisation: integration, independence, consistency, support for carers, meeting individuals' needs, and the workforce. This paper lists the principal features of each study, provides an overview of the literature, and presents substantive findings relating to three of the modernisation themes (integration, independence and individuals' needs). The account provides a systematic portrayal both of the state of social care for older people prior to the modernisation process and of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the evidence base. It suggests that, for evidence-based practice and policy to become a reality in social care for older people, there is a general need for higher quality studies in this area.


Author(s):  
Catherine Needham ◽  
Kerry Allen ◽  
Kelly Hall

Chapter eight draws on the interviews undertaken with people running care organisations, to bring out three types of innovation - what innovation, how innovation and who innovation. This chapter identifies the different types of innovation that are displayed within the specific context of care; referred to here as what, how and who innovations. In terms of what innovations, some micro-enterprises are delivering services that deviate from the traditional residential, domiciliary and day models of care through the provision of flexible ‘one-to-one support’. Whilst micro-enterprises were offering more flexible services, larger organisations were also offering a broad range of services, and in day provision especially, larger services were found to offer more choice to service users. Whilst it tends to be the what and who innovations within micro-enterprises that are most widely reported, it may be the how innovations that are most important when it comes to the context of social care for older people. For people receiving personal care in the home, the scope for micro providers to take a more flexible approach gives them an advantage over large care providers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document