Comparisons of Least Squares and Errors-in-Variables Regression, with Special Reference to Randomized Analysis of Covariance.

1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond J. Carroll ◽  
P. Gallo ◽  
L. J. Gleser
Technometrics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Morton-Jones ◽  
Robin Henderson

2014 ◽  
Vol 88 (7) ◽  
pp. 705-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiliang Xu ◽  
Jingnan Liu ◽  
Wenxian Zeng ◽  
Yunzhong Shen

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Schaffrin ◽  
F. Neitzel ◽  
S. Uzun ◽  
V. Mahboub

Modifying Cadzow's algorithm to generate the optimal TLS-solution for the structured EIV-Model of a similarity transformationIn 2005, Felus and Schaffrin discussed the problem of a Structured Errors-in-Variables (EIV) Model in the context of a parameter adjustment for a classical similarity transformation. Their proposal, however, to perform a Total Least-Squares (TLS) adjustment, followed by a Cadzow step to imprint the proper structure, would not always guarantee the identity of this solution with the optimal Structured TLS solution, particularly in view of the residuals. Here, an attempt will be made to modify the Cadzow step in order to generate the optimal solution with the desired structure as it would, for instance, also result from a traditional LS-adjustment within an iteratively linearized Gauss-Helmert Model (GHM). Incidentally, this solution coincides with the (properly) Weighted TLS solution which does not need a Cadzow step.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document