Regulating Interchange Fees in Payment Systems

Author(s):  
Joshua S. Gans ◽  
Stephen P. King

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Rochet ◽  
Jean Tirole

The paper offers a roadmap to the current economic thinking concerning interchange fees. After describing the fundamental externalities inherent in payment systems and analysing merchant resistance to interchange fee increases and the associations' determination of this fee, it derives the externalities' implications for welfare analysis. It then discusses whether consumer surplus or social welfare is the proper benchmark for regulatory purposes. Finally, it offers a critique of the current regulatory approach, and concludes with a call for more novel and innovative thinking about how to reconcile regulators' concerns and the industry legitimate desire to perform its balancing act.



2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Schmalensee


2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua S Gans ◽  
Stephen P. King

Significant attention worldwide has been paid to the regulation of credit card interchange fees. In part, this attention has followed concerns expressed about the level of these fees in Europe, the U.S. and Australia. The Reserve Bank of Australia recently conducted an extensive inquiry into the interchange fees associated with credit cards and has moved to regulate those fees. At the same time, research economists have considered determinants of the socially optimal interchange fee. In this paper, we use the Australian experience to highlight alternative methods of regulating interchange fees in payments systems. We use a simple model to derive a socially optimal interchange fee when merchants cannot freely set different prices for different payment instruments. We compare the socially optimal interchange fee from this model with those presented in the economics literature and show that most analyses capture a simple externality within the optimal fee. Credit card usage for a specific transaction is determined by the customer. But the customer does not bear the costs or receive the benefits that card usage imposes on the merchant. The optimal interchange fee internalises this externality. We then compare the theoretical optimal interchange fee with the approaches proposed in Australia, and show that the regulatory approach adopted by the Reserve Bank of Australia may be viewed as economically conservative in certain situations. Finally, we consider additional issues that will impinge on the regulation of interchange fees.



10.3386/w8256 ◽  
2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Schmalensee


2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Prager

The following is a transcription of my discussion of the three papers (published in this issue) that were presented in the "Panel of Country Studies" session of the Antitrust Activity in Card-Based Payment Systems: Causes and Consequences conference.



2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Bourreau ◽  
Marianne Verdier


Author(s):  
Marc Bourreau ◽  
Marianne Verdier




Author(s):  
Joshua S. Gans ◽  
Stephen P. King


Author(s):  
Joshua S Gans ◽  
Stephen P King

Abstract There has been considerable public debate over the effect of interchange fees on credit card transactions. Regulators in Australia and Europe have argued that these fees can be set by banks to have an anticompetitive effect. In the US, it has been argued that these fees, together with a rule that prevents a surcharge for credit purchases, might create a cross subsidy between cash and credit customers. Academics have noted that, in particular circumstances, interchange fees have no real effects in the absence of such a no-surcharge rule. This paper demonstrates that the potential neutrality of interchange fees is a general result. We show that in the absence of a no surcharge rule or, alternatively, if there is perfect competition at the merchant level, interchange fees can be changed without leading to any real effects. This result does not depend on the degree or nature of competition at either the bank or the merchant level. We conclude that the elimination of no surcharge rules may provide practical policy solutions for authorities concerned about the level of interchange fees.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document