Treatment of Comminuted Distal Radius Fractures Using Spanning External Fixator

2022 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 372-378
Author(s):  
Abdelsalam Eid Abdelsala ◽  
Osam Mohammed Metwally ◽  
Salah Mahmoud Abd El Kader ◽  
Emad Mohammed Ali Alfirjani
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

scholarly journals Effectiveness of external fixator combined with T-plate internal fixation for the treatment of comminuted distal radius fractures

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 2912-2919 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.R. Han ◽  
C.X. Jin ◽  
J. Yan ◽  
S.Z. Han ◽  
X.B. He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

scholarly journals Use of Cobra External Fixator for treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
Niraj Ranjeet ◽  
Pratyenta Raj Onta ◽  
Krishna Sapkota ◽  
Pabin Thapa ◽  
Krishna Wahegoankar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Ao Classification ◽  
Functional Activities ◽  
Clavicle Fractures

Background: Distal radius fractures are one of the commonest injuries only after clavicle fractures. These fractures poses challenges to the treating surgeons as a result of which these fractures are sometime treated unacceptably and leads to poor outcome. Among various treatment options for these fractures wrist sparing Cobra external fixator is one of the options with an impressive stability and outstanding functional outcomes.Aims and Objectives: To determine whether this system can achieve adequate reduction of a variety of DRF, is able to maintain reduction despite hand and wrist movements, whether it compromises hand and wrist functions and leads to long term problems.Materials and Methods: From July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017, all skeletally matured patients with acute distal radius fractures (AO-A2, B1, C1, C2) were adequately reduced and fixed with Cobra ex-fix. Immediately post-op patients were encouraged to start range of motion of the wrist as the pain decreased. The patients were followed up in 2,4 and 8 weeks and were analyzed clinically, radiologically, their functional outcomes and any complications.Results: Twenty-two patients were included in our study. Nine were males and 13 were females. Using the AO classification, 15 were classified as A2, 2 were B1, 3 were C1, and 2 were C2. The mean number of weeks the cobra fixator was maintained was 5.3 weeks. The Cobra ex-fix was able to achieve excellent maintenance of radial height and radial inclination and good maintenance of dorsal tilt. Recovery of functional activities according to Gartland and Werley’s functional scoring system was good to excellent in all patients at 8 weeks follow-up.Conclusion: The Cobra external fixation system is an outstanding device for use in fractures of the distal radius. It achieves superior anatomic correction and is dependable in maintaining fracture reduction even with hand and wrist use.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.9(6) 2018 84-89

Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures Using the Percutaneous K-wire Reduction-Fixation and External Fixator

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Jin Cheon ◽  
Ja Gyung Ku ◽  
Dong Ho Lee ◽  
Hui Taek Kim ◽  
Jeung Tak Suh
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

scholarly journals Volar locking plate versus external fixation in distal radius fractures: A meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Maccagnano ◽  
Giovanni Noia ◽  
Giovanni Vicenti ◽  
Marco Baglioni ◽  
Maria Rosa Masciale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Wrist Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of plate or external fixator treatments in distal radius fractures, based not only on clinical and radiographic parameters but on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) parameters. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed when conducting this systematic review. The Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (RAMSTAR) checklist was additionally consulted in order to ensure a high-quality methodological process, encompassing such elements as an ‘a priori’ design, independent reviews and comprehensive search. The literature search was carried out on PubMed, MEDLINE and Scopus. The search terms used were “Radius fracture AND osteosynthesis”, “Wrist fracture AND external fixator” and “Wrist fracture AND plate”. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. To determine inter-reviewer agreement, a k score was calculated after each screening state. Of the 5753 studies collected through the initial databases search, two studies were included in the final meta-analysis (125 treated with external fixator vs 132 with volar plate). There was a substantial inter-reviewer agreement as to the title (0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.79) abstract (0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.83) and fulltext screening stages (0.89; 95%CI, 0.67-1). The meta-analysis reported a mean difference equal to 0.00 (95%CI= -0.05 – 0.05), in accordance with I2= 0% and p test for the heterogeneity value=0.089. This meta analysis confirms and quantifies that the two techniques are superimposable as regards the quality of life reported by patients at least one year of follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document