Vibratory contact transducer for the metric module of multipurpose machine tools

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 296-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Trompet ◽  
A. Ya. Krasil’nikov
2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 892-895
Author(s):  
G. V. Shadskii ◽  
V. S. Sal’nikov ◽  
O. A. Erzin

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1248-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Polyakov ◽  
A. N. Goncharov

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 876-878
Author(s):  
G. M. Trompet ◽  
S. V. Butakov ◽  
N. K. Kazantseva ◽  
V. A. Aleksandrov ◽  
A. S. Bubkin

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-68
Author(s):  
M. Z. Khostikoev ◽  
I. K. Danilov ◽  
Yu. F. Nabatnikov ◽  
V. A. Timiryazev

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Kul’ga ◽  
P. V. Vinogradov ◽  
A. A. Gaitova

Author(s):  
C. W. McCutchen ◽  
Lois W. Tice

Ultramicrotomists live in a state of guerilla warfare with chatter. This situation is likely to be permanent. We can infer this from the history of machine tools. If set the wrong way for the particular combination of cutting tool and material, most if not all machine tools will chatter.In more than 100 years since machine tools became common, no one has evolved a practical recipe that guarantees avoiding chatter. Rather than follow some single very conservative rule to avoid chatter in all cases, machinists detect it when it happens, and change conditions until it stops. This is possible because they have no trouble telling when their cutting tool is chattering. They can see chatter marks, and they can also hear a sometimes deafening noise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document