scholarly journals Adult Sigmoido-Rectal Intussusception Presenting as Gangrenous Bowel and Rectal Prolapse: A Rare Presentation

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 24-26
Author(s):  
Renu Saini ◽  
Urmila Basu ◽  
Niraj Kumar ◽  
Raj Mithun Degala ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Dubey
1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 817-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Mellgren ◽  
Inkeri Schultz ◽  
Claes Johansson ◽  
Anders Dolk

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1985624
Author(s):  
Amanda C Filiberto ◽  
Tyler J Loftus ◽  
Sanda A Tan ◽  
Thomas E Read ◽  
Atif Iqbal

Rectal prolapse is usually of benign etiology. Rarely, sigmoido-rectal intussusception results from a malignant lead-point. We report the case of a patient with a partially obstructing sigmoid cancer causing a full thickness rectal prolapse requiring surgical intervention. An 82-year-old woman presented with 1 week of rectal bleeding, fecal incontinence, and weight loss. Computed tomography identified sigmoido-rectal intussusception. Colonoscopic biopsy revealed high-grade dysplasia. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a 6-cm mass forming the lead point of the intussusceptum with epiploic appendages seen within the rectal lumen. She underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection with final pathology consistent with T2N0 adenocarcinoma, and recovered well. Among adult patients with rectal prolapse, suspicion for underlying malignancy should prompt a thorough investigation to inform the decision for resection, which may be safely performed by minimally invasive techniques.


BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 342 (feb01 1) ◽  
pp. c7099-c7099 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. M. Jones ◽  
C. Cunningham ◽  
I. Lindsey

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 578-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bremmer ◽  
R. Udén ◽  
A. Mellgren

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of defaeco-peritone-ography in diagnosing rectal intussusception as distinct from mucosal folds in the rectum, and rectal prolapse as distinct from mucosal prolapse. Material and Methods: Fifty-seven patients with defaecation disorders were examined by means of defaeco-peritoneography. Results: Twenty-three patients had rectal intussusception and 7 patients had rectal prolapse at defaeco-peritoneography. All these patients had a rectal peritoneocele in the serosal ring-pocket of the rectal intussusception or in the rectal prolapse. Twenty-seven patients had neither rectal intussusception nor rectal prolapse and none of these patients had a rectal peritoneocele. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that only patients with a rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse have a rectal peritoneocele. Defaeco-peritoneography therefore offers correct diagnosis of rectal intussusception as distinct from mucosal folds in the rectum, and of rectal prolapse as distinct from mucosal prolapse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document