scholarly journals Peer‐reviewing geen valide basis voor erkennen en waarderen van onderzoeksprestaties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris Breetvelt
Keyword(s):  
Peer Reviewing

Peer-reviewing fungeert als poortwachter voor onderzoeksvoorstellen en wetenschappelijke publicaties. In het statement van de VSNU over Erkennen en Waarderen van wetenschappers (Recognition and Rewards) wordt niet kritisch gereflecteerd op peer-reviewing ter beoordeling van wetenschappelijke prestaties. De kwaliteit van referentenrapporten als beoordeling van onderzoeksvoorstellen is soms twijfelachtig. De referentencommentaren op manuscripten voor publicatie zijn vaak inadequaat, inconsistent en/of vooringenomen. De beoordelingen door vakgenoten missen betrouwbaarheid en validiteit. In het beoordelingsproces zijn auteur(s) en reviewers ongelijkwaardig. Peer-reviewing draagt daardoor bij aan aangeleerde hulpeloosheid en sociale onveiligheid van wetenschappers. Peer reviewing ter beoordeling van onderzoeksprestaties verdient heroverweging.

Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Soldani ◽  
Marco Kuhrmann ◽  
Dietmar Pfahl
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Peer Reviewing

Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering (5)

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Jacopo Soldani
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Lively Discussion ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Peer Reviewing

ACM SIGSOFT SEN's column on "Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering" aims at fostering an open, constructive, and lively discussion on the peer-reviewing currently adopted by SE venues, e.g., how to further enhance them and make them sustainable on the long run. This fifth editorial introduces a new contribution to the column, which provides a journal-centric perspective on the topic.

scholarly journals Learning through Peer Reviewing and Publishing in the Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics: Twenty Years Later

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-352
Author(s):  
Christina P. Walker ◽  
Terri L. Towner ◽  
Rosalee A. Clawson ◽  
Zoe M. Oxley ◽  
Christine L. Nemacheck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Research ◽  
College Classroom ◽  
Board Members ◽  
Peer Reviewing ◽  
Purdue University ◽  
Upper Level ◽  
Honor Society

ABSTRACTThe Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics (PSAJ), sponsored by the Pi Sigma Alpha National Honor Society, was founded in 2001 at Purdue University. After 20 years, much has changed in undergraduate research and publishing, but the benefits of producing a peer-reviewed journal remain the same. Undergraduate research has increased in prominence, and the journal has modernized to meet these transformations. This article describes the history, purpose, and operations of the PSAJ. Most important, a survey of former Editorial Board members, Pi Sigma Alpha Faculty Chapter Advisors, and published authors in the journal reveal attitudes toward operating an undergraduate journal, using undergraduate research in the college classroom, and publishing in a peer-reviewed journal, respectively. We conclude with calls to continue to encourage undergraduate research and to assign published undergraduate research in upper-level courses.

scholarly journals CORRIGENDUM ON THE REPORT ‘THE RESEARCH JOURNAL TRANSPORT: PEER-REVIEWING PROCESS IN 2016’

Transport ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-111
Author(s):  
Olegas Prentkovskis ◽  
Raimundas Junevičius
Keyword(s):  
Research Journal ◽  
Peer Reviewing

"Corrigendum on the report ‘The research journal TRANSPORT: peer-reviewing process in 2016’." Transport, 32(1), p. 111.

scholarly journals THE RESEARCH JOURNAL TRANSPORT: PEER-REVIEWING PROCESS IN 2017

Transport ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-434
Author(s):  
Olegas PRENTKOVSKIS ◽  
Raimundas JUNEVIČIUS ◽  
Paulius SKAČKAUSKAS
Keyword(s):  
Research Journal ◽  
Peer Reviewing

The research journal TRANSPORT: peer-reviewing process in 2017, Transport, 32:4, 426-434

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document