WIENER INVARIANTS OF PRODUCT OF GRAPHS

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 2365-2371
Author(s):  
S. Nagarajan ◽  
G. Priyadharsini
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 8357-8365
Author(s):  
S. M. Aliyar ◽  
K. Manikandan ◽  
S. Manimaran

2019 ◽  
Vol 342 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-814
Author(s):  
Tanja Gologranc ◽  
Polona Repolusk

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-303
Author(s):  
Elefterie Olaru ◽  
Eugen M??ndrescu

1976 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-159
Author(s):  
V. Krishnamoorthy
Keyword(s):  

The author has noticed two small errors in his paper [1]: In Figure 1 on p. 290, the vertices labelled 4n, 4n + 1, 4n + 2 should be labelled 4n − 1, 4n, 4n + 1, respectively. In the 14th line on p. 291, “at a distance greater than 2n − 1” should read “at a distance greater than 2n − 2”.


2017 ◽  
Vol 855 ◽  
pp. 012010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dafik ◽  
Ika Hesti Agustin ◽  
A. I. Nurvitaningrum ◽  
R. M. Prihandini
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 1450001 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. CHITHRA ◽  
A. VIJAYAKUMAR

The diameter of a graph can be affected by the addition or deletion of edges. In this paper, we examine the Cartesian product of graphs whose diameter increases (decreases) by the deletion (addition) of a single edge. The problems of minimality and maximality of the Cartesian product of graphs with respect to its diameter are also solved. These problems are motivated by the fact that most of the interconnection networks are graph products and a good network must be hard to disrupt and the transmissions must remain connected even if some vertices or edges fail.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ika Hesti Agustin ◽  
R.M. Prihandini ◽  
Dafik
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 186 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Balakrishnan ◽  
P. Paulraja

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document