scholarly journals Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: Does foil context matter?

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1063-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winston D. Goh ◽  
Huiqin Tan
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Interference ◽  
Cued Recall ◽  
Short Term

Effects of Proactive Interference and Rehearsal on the Primary and Secondary Components of Short-Term Retention

1975 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Turvey ◽  
Robert A. Weeks
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Interference ◽  
Primary Memory ◽  
The Other ◽  
Secondary Memory ◽  
Retention Function ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Retention Period ◽  
Term Retention ◽  
Proactive Effects

Under the conditions of the distractor paradigm, short-term retention declines to a minimum in a very brief period. The rapid forgetting can be said to reflect the declining contribution of the short-term store or primary memory and the asymptote can be taken as a measure of the contribution of the long-term store or secondary memory. It was shown that manipulating proactive effects by varying the recency of prior material affected only the primary memory component of the short-term retention function. On the other hand manipulating the difficulty of the subsidiary task performed during the retention period with proactive effects held constant affected both the primary and the secondary components. The results were discussed with respect to the relation between the two memory components and the idea that proactive effects are limited to long-term store.

The Role of the Interpolated Task in Short-Term Retention

1966 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Conrad ◽  
A. J. Hull
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Interference ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Interference Theory ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Term Retention ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Single Set

It has been proposed that a single set of operations based on classical interference theory is adequate to describe the phenomena of both short- and long-term memory. An article by Keppel and Underwood (1962) argues that short-term forgetting is due to proactive interference and, by implication, not a result of trace decay. An experiment which varied retention interval and the nature of the interpolated task, gave results which indicate that when the amount forgotten and the nature of errors are considered, a decay model is supported, the proactive interference suggestion being untenable.

Categorical Encoding in Short-Term Memory by Deaf and Hearing Children

1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 426-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry W. Hoemann ◽  
Carol E. Andrews ◽  
Donald V. DeRosa
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Interference ◽  
Special Interest ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Deaf Children ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Process Information ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Hearing Children

Thirty-seven deaf and 38 hearing children, ages eight to 12, were tested in a short-term memory task. Special interest focused on the build-up and release of proactive interference (PI). Both groups showed PI when the items were drawn from the same conceptual class of animals. In addition, experimental groups of deaf and hearing subjects showed a release from PI when shifted to a set of items drawn from a different category on the last trial. It was concluded that deaf children encode categorically in short-term memory (suggesting a normally functioning ability to think abstractly and to process information without acoustic mediators).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document