scholarly journals The role of Pudendal Nerve Terminal Motor Latency (PNTML) in the assessment of the external anal sphincter function

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
MSB Tillakaratne ◽  
DN Samarasekera
1998 ◽  
Vol 274 (2) ◽  
pp. G419-G423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaheen Hamdy ◽  
Paul Enck ◽  
Qasim Aziz ◽  
John C. Rothwell ◽  
Samet Uengoergil ◽  
...  

We investigated the effects of lumbosacral and pudendal nerve stimulation on the corticofugal pathways to the human external anal sphincter. In 11 healthy subjects, anal sphincter electromyographic responses, evoked to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex, were recorded 5–500 ms after lumbosacral root or pudendal nerve stimulation. Lumbosacral and pudendal nerve stimulation alone evoked responses with amplitudes of 293 ± 73 and 401 ± 153 μV and latencies of 3.2 ± 0.2 and 2.2 ± 0.2 ms, respectively. Cortical stimulation also evoked responses with amplitudes of 351 ± 104 μV and latencies of 20.9 ± 1.1 ms. When lumbosacral or pudendal nerve stimulation preceded cortical stimulation, the cortically evoked responses were facilitated ( P < 0.01), with the effect appearing greatest at 5–20 ms after both lumbosacral and pudendal excitation and at 50–100 ms after lumbosacral excitation alone. Our results demonstrate that cortical pathways to the external anal sphincter are facilitated by prior lumbosacral and pudendal nerve stimulation, indicating that sensorimotor interactions are important in the central neural control of sphincter function.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. A40
Author(s):  
C. Quondamcarlo ◽  
G. Forlini ◽  
P. Fenderico ◽  
M. Ruggeri ◽  
G. Valentini ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Weber ◽  
F. Beuret-Blanquart ◽  
P. Ducrotte ◽  
J. Y. Touchais ◽  
P. Denis

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1410-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Loganathan ◽  
A. C. Schloithe ◽  
P. Hakendorf ◽  
C. M. Liyanage ◽  
M. Costa ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Thomas ◽  
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur ◽  
Gilles Galula ◽  
Vincent de Parades ◽  
Josee Bourguignon ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1250-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Vaccaro ◽  
Denis M.O. Cheong ◽  
Steven D. Wexner ◽  
Virgilio D. Salanga ◽  
Reginald C. Phillips ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Byrne ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
E S Kiff ◽  
K J Telford

Abstract Introduction We have suggested that mean Opening Pressure (Op) recorded during Anal Acoustic Reflectometry (AAR) predominantly represents IAS function however, the extent remains unknown. The aim was to investigate this by excluding the external anal sphincter during general anaesthetic (GA) with confirmed neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Method Patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery requiring GA+NMB were approached. Patients had pre-operative (awake) and during GA + NMB (asleep) AAR measurements performed. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was assessed permitting the Op value to also be recorded when the IAS was inhibited. Op was recorded at prerectal distension and then after 100 mls of air was inflated within a balloon in the rectum (post-rectal distension). Result 19 patients were included. The values of Op (cmH20) and the reductions observed during the RAIR when awake/asleep are as follows: Awake Op: prerectal distension (64.94) and post-rectal distension (35.35) therefore mean change 29.59 cmH2O i.e. 44.6% reduction Asleep Op: prerectal distension (37.64) and post-rectal distension (15.55) therefore mean change 22.1 i.e. 55.3% reduction The contribution of the IAS to Op is calculated as follows: (Mean change Op awake x 100)/% reduction in RAIR asleep = IAS contribution awake (29.59cmH20 x 100)/55.3 = 53.51cmH20 Total mean Op awake—IAS contribution awake = EAS contribution awake 64.94cmH20–53.51cmH20 (82.4%) = 11.43cmH20 (17.6%) Conclusion The IAS accounts for 82.4% of Op at rest and it remains our hypothesis that Op primarily represents IAS function. Take-home Message Opening pressure primarily represents internal anal sphincter function.


2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1173-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bajwa ◽  
K. Thiruppathy ◽  
P. Trivedi ◽  
P. Boulos ◽  
A. Emmanuel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document