scholarly journals Speech sound perception of nucleus cochlear implant patients.

1989 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
Sotaro Funasaka
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Sound Perception ◽  
Speech Sound Perception

scholarly journals SPEECH SOUND PERCEPTION MODALITY IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT PROCESSING STRATEGIES

1988 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-184,317
Author(s):  
SOTARO FUNASAKA ◽  
KUMIKO YUKAWA ◽  
OSAMU TAKAHASHI ◽  
SHINICHI HATSUSHIKA ◽  
MUTSUMI HOSOYA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Sound Perception ◽  
Processing Strategies ◽  
Speech Sound Perception

Speech Sound Perception and Learning: Biologic Bases

1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Kraus ◽  
Therese J. McGee ◽  
Dawn Burton Koch
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sound ◽  
Sound Perception ◽  
Speech Sound Perception

scholarly journals Motoric Training Alters Speech Sound Perception and Production — Active Listening Training Does Not Lead into Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Kimmo U. Peltola ◽  
Henna Tamminen ◽  
Paavo Alku ◽  
Teija Kujala ◽  
Maija S. Peltola
Keyword(s):  
Target Stimulus ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Active Listening ◽  
Sound Perception ◽  
Word Context ◽  
Plastic Changes ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Speech Sound Perception ◽  
Group 1

Accurate speech-sound perception and production are prerequisites for communication in a non-native language. Earlier research has shown that new categorization and pronunciation patterns evolve in different learning settings and that these skills can be trained with various methods. We tested the effects of two types of training protocols on the production and identification of L2 vowels embedded in a pseudo-word context. Group 1 (Producers) participated in a listen and repeat training, where they produced the target stimulus /tᵾ:ti/ and the non-target stimulus /ty:ti/ after the example in a pseudo-randomized order; Group 2 (Listeners) was instructed to count the number of targets /tᵾ:ti/ in the same stimulus train without any motoric production movements. The results showed clearly that listen and repeat training led to plastic changes both in production and in identification, while no learning effects were obtained with the listening paradigm. This suggests a significant role of motoric experience in the acquisition of speech.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document