Revision Hip Arthroplasty with a Cementless Femoral Stem

Hip & Pelvis ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Young-Yool Chung ◽  
Chae-Hyun Lim ◽  
Chung-Young Kim ◽  
Jeong-Seok Kim
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1245-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sureshan Sivananthan ◽  
Chin-Tat Lim ◽  
Rapeepat Narkbunnam ◽  
Alex Sox-Harris ◽  
James I. Huddleston ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G. M. Kavalerskiy ◽  
V. Yu. Murylyov ◽  
Ya. A. Rukin ◽  
M. Yu. Kholodaev ◽  
P. M. Elizarov

Experience in revision hip arthroplasty with change of femoral stem was analyzed for 165 patients. In 107 operations (64.8%) Wagner SL Revision Stems were used, in the rest of cases - femoral components of other manufacturers. Distribution of patients by femoral defect type by Paprovsky was the following: I type - 27 patients, II type - 75, IIIA type - 59, IIIB and IV type - 4 patients. Good results at use of Wagner SL Revision Stems and stems of other manufacturers were comparable and made up 87.9 and 86.2%, respectively. Achieved data enabled to make conclusion that Wagner SL Revision Stem use is reasonable for patients with hip implant instability in I-IIIA femoral bone deficit, as they are cheaper than the modular revision stems and their design prevents the wear in the area of modular junction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 99-B (4) ◽  
pp. 440-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Lee ◽  
W-L. Jo ◽  
Y. C. Ha ◽  
Y. K. Lee ◽  
S. B. Goodman ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joong Myung Lee ◽  
Jae Young Roh ◽  
Young Soo Park

2017 ◽  
Vol 99-B (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. De Martino ◽  
V. De Santis ◽  
R. D’ Apolito ◽  
P. K. Sculco ◽  
M. B. Cross ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ho Cho ◽  
Jonathan P. Garino ◽  
Suk-Kyu Choo ◽  
Kye-Young Han ◽  
Jung-Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document