Constructing efficient and secure batch signature schemes

Author(s):  
Trieu Quang Phong

In ordinary signature schemes, such as RSA, DSA, ECDSA, the signing process is performed only for a single message. Due to performance issues, in some contexts, the above solutions will become unsuitable if a party needs to sign multiple messages simultaneously. For example, in the authenticated key exchange protocols based on signatures between client and server, the server is expected to handle multiple key exchange requests from different clients simultaneously. Batch signing is a solution that generates signatures for multi-messages simultaneously with a single (ordinary) signature generation. In this article, we will consider some of the existing batch signing solutions and point out a few of their weakness. To deal with these problems, the paper also proposes two secure types of batch signature schemes, but still ensures the same efficiency as the existing batch signing solution.

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
S. Sathya ◽  
M. Ranjith Kumar ◽  
K. Madheswaran

The keyestablishment for secure many-to-many communications is very important nowadays. The problem is inspired by the proliferation of large-scale distributed file systems supporting parallel access to multiple storage devices. In this, a variety of authenticated key exchange protocols that are designed to address the issues. This shows that these protocols are capable of reducing the workload of the metadata server and concurrently supporting forward secrecy and escrow-freeness. All this requires only a small fraction of increased computation overhead at the client. This proposed three authenticated key exchange protocols for parallel network file system (pNFS). The protocols offer three appealing advantages over the existing Kerberos-based protocol. First, the metadata server executing these protocols has much lower workload than that of the Kerberos-based approach. Second, two of these protocols provide forward secrecy: one is partially forward secure (with respect to multiple sessions within a time period), while the other is fully forward secure (with respect to a session). Third, designed a protocol which not only provides forward secrecy, but is also escrow-free.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document