scholarly journals Palliative Integration Into Ambulatory Oncology: An Advance Care Planning Quality Improvement Project

Author(s):  
Amanda Hudson Lucas, DNP, RN, ACNS-BC, ACHPN ◽  
Amy Dimmer, DNP, RN, ACCNS-AG

Advance care planning (ACP) is essential to ensuring that patient-centered end-of-life goals are respected if a health crisis occurs. Advanced practitioner barriers to ACP include insufficient time and limited confidence in discussions. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase advanced cancer patients’ electronic health record (EHR) documented surrogate decision maker and ACP documentation by 25% over 8 weeks. A secondary aim was to decrease patients’ decisional conflict scores (DCS) related to life-sustaining treatment preferences after a clinical nurse specialist (CNS)-led ACP session. Using the define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) process of quality improvement methodology, an interprofessional team led by a palliative CNS fostered practice change by (a) incorporating a patient self-administered Supportive Care and Communication Questionnaire (SCCQ) to standardize the ACP assessment, (b) creating an EHR nursing and provider documentation template, (c) offering advanced cancer patients a palliative CNS consultation for ACP review and advance directive completion, and (d) evaluating patients’ DCS through the four-item SURE tool. Of 126 participants provided with the SCCQ, 90 completed the document, resulting in a 71% return rate. Among the completed SCCQs, 37% (n = 33) requested a CNS consultation, with 76% (n = 25) returning for the ACP session. The CNS intervention yielded an average reduction of 1.4 points in SURE tool findings, a statistically significant decrease determined by a paired sample t-test. The project’s interprofessional collaboration promoted a system-wide standardized ACP process throughout ambulatory, acute, and post-hospital settings.

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1304-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traci M. Kazmerski ◽  
Daniel J. Weiner ◽  
Janice Matisko ◽  
Diane Schachner ◽  
Whitney Lerch ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama W. Amro ◽  
Malar Ramasamy ◽  
James A. Strom ◽  
Daniel E. Weiner ◽  
Bertrand L. Jaber

Author(s):  
Masanori Mori

Physicians and advanced cancer patients are often reluctant to talk about death. They frequently avoid end-of-life discussions (EOLds), although such conversations are essential to initiate advance care planning. In this prospective, a longitudinal multisite cohort study of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers, the authors suggested cascading benefits of EOLds between patients and their physicians. In total, 123 of 332 (37.0%) patients reported having EOLds with their physicians at baseline. EOLds were not associated with higher rates of emotional distress or psychiatric disorders. Instead, after propensity-score weighted adjustment, EOLds were associated with less aggressive medical care near death and earlier hospice referrals. Aggressive care was associated with worse patient quality of life and worse bereavement adjustment. These findings may help destigmatize EOLds and assist physicians and patients in initiating such conversations and engaging in advance care planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document