creature forcing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Martin Goldstern ◽  
Lukas Daniel Klausner

Abstract We reimplement the creature forcing construction used by Fischer et al. (Arch Math Log 56(7–8):1045–1103, 2017. 10.1007/S00153-017-0553-8. arXiv:1402.0367 [math.LO]) to separate Cichoń’s diagram into five cardinals as a countable support product. Using the fact that it is of countable support, we augment our construction by adding uncountably many additional cardinal characteristics, sometimes referred to as localisation cardinals.



2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1045-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Fischer ◽  
Martin Goldstern ◽  
Jakob Kellner ◽  
Saharon Shelah


2016 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 110-126
Author(s):  
Natasha Dobrinen
Keyword(s):  


2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 49-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Kellner ◽  
Saharon Shelah


2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Kellner ◽  
Saharon Shelah

AbstractFor f, g ∈ ωω let be the minimal number of uniform g-splitting trees (or: Slaloms) to cover the uniform f-splitting tree, i.e., for every branch v of the f-tree, one of the g-trees contains v. is the dual notion: For every branch v, one of the g-trees guesses v(m) infinitely often.It is consistent that for ℵ1 many pairwise different cardinals κ∊ and suitable pairs (f∊, g∊).For the proof we use creatures with sufficient bigness and halving. We show that the lim-inf creature forcing satisfies fusion and pure decision. We introduce decisiveness and use it to construct a variant of the countable support iteration of such forcings, which still satisfies fusion and pure decision.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document