Background:
The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in M2 occlusions is uncertain.
Methods:
In a prospective multicenter cohort study of imaging selection (SELECT), EVT outcomes were compared to medical managment (MM) in M2 occlusions. Further, we assessed for potential treatment benefit in patients with higher stroke severity (NIHSS) and a larger perfusion deficit on CTP (Tmax > 6 sec - ischemic core volume)The primary outcome was excellent outcome (mRS 0-1).
Results:
of 361 patients enrolled in SELECT, 87 had isolated M2 occlusion (EVT 59, MM 28). Baseline NIHSS median (IQR) (EVT 14 (10-20), MM 15 (9.5-19.5), p=0.72) and infarct volume rCBF<30% (EVT 7 (0-21) vs MM 18.5 (0-41.25), P=0.10). EVT was associated with higher rates of excellent outcomes (53% vs 21%, aOR:6.94, 95% CI=1.86-25.90, p=0.004) with a shift towards better mRS outcomes (adj cOR: 3.49, 95% CI=1.39-8.80, p=0.008), smaller final infarct volume (15.9 (2.7-48.0) vs 58 (24.3-141.9), P<0.001), and a reduction of neurological worsening (3% vs 22%, p=0.011), sICH (2% vs 21%, p=0.004), and mortality (5% vs 25%, p=0.011). Assessing outcomes in NIHSS strata; there was no significant increase in excellent outcomes rates in NIHSS ≤10 (EVT 65% vs MM 50%, aOR=1.59, 95% CI=0.21-12.01, p=0.65). In contrast, patients with NIHSS>10 had better outcomes with EVT (46%) vs MM (10%), aOR=11.39, 95% CI=1.80-72.11, p=0.01 as shown in figure 1. As perfusion deficit lesion size increased, the odds of achieving excellent outcomes was reduced (for each 10cc by 11%, aOR: 0.89, 95% CI=0.79-1.00, p=0.05). Excellent outcomes declined in patients with MM as perfusion deficit lesion size increased, yet in the EVT they were maintained as shown in figure 2. Similar results were obtained for mRS 0-2.
Conclusion:
EVT may result in better rates of excellent outcomes in isolated M2 occlusions, especially those with more severe strokes and larger perfusion deficits who are more likely to have worse outcomes without emergent reperfusion.