product verification
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

55
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Cheman Shaik

Counterfeit production is a threat for every genuine business causing damage to their brand image and stealing their revenues. The aim of this paper is topresenta novel method to prevent counterfeit products using cryptography, QR code and webservice. The method requires that every original product manufacturer obtain a cryptographic key pair, securely store their private key and publish their public key on their website as a QR code. The product manufacturer needs to print a unique item code on their product packs and provide inside the pack a QR code encoding the ciphertext generated by encrypting the item code with their private key. For product verification by buyers, the manufacture is required to provide a QR code scanning app for download on their website, Google Play Store or iPhone App Store. The scanning app should have additional cryptographic functionality to decrypt ciphertext of the item code encoded in the QR code. The manufacturer also needs to launch a simple webservice on his hosting server to accept requests from the mobile app and verify the item code and buyer’s name in its database. Technicalimplementation and the verification process are described in detail through figures and flowchart. The method can be implemented even by small manufacturers with nominal cost by obtaining a key pair and creating a scanning app and webservices. We have also tested the method with an actual software code written for cryptographic operations using the Java cryptography Extension and QR code operations using Google Zxing libraries.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahtishwaren A/L Sargunan ◽  
Muhammad Shahar Jusoh ◽  
Dayang Hasliza Muhd Yusuf ◽  
Mohd Salleh Hj Din

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-284
Author(s):  
Hao Ji ◽  
Michael Mascagni ◽  
Yaohang Li

AbstractIn this article, we consider the general problem of checking the correctness of matrix multiplication. Given three n\times n matrices 𝐴, 𝐵 and 𝐶, the goal is to verify that A\times B=C without carrying out the computationally costly operations of matrix multiplication and comparing the product A\times B with 𝐶, term by term. This is especially important when some or all of these matrices are very large, and when the computing environment is prone to soft errors. Here we extend Freivalds’ algorithm to a Gaussian Variant of Freivalds’ Algorithm (GVFA) by projecting the product A\times B as well as 𝐶 onto a Gaussian random vector and then comparing the resulting vectors. The computational complexity of GVFA is consistent with that of Freivalds’ algorithm, which is O(n^{2}). However, unlike Freivalds’ algorithm, whose probability of a false positive is 2^{-k}, where 𝑘 is the number of iterations, our theoretical analysis shows that, when A\times B\neq C, GVFA produces a false positive on set of inputs of measure zero with exact arithmetic. When we introduce round-off error and floating-point arithmetic into our analysis, we can show that the larger this error, the higher the probability that GVFA avoids false positives. Moreover, by iterating GVFA 𝑘 times, the probability of a false positive decreases as p^{k}, where 𝑝 is a very small value depending on the nature of the fault on the result matrix and the arithmetic system’s floating-point precision. Unlike deterministic algorithms, there do not exist any fault patterns that are completely undetectable with GVFA. Thus GVFA can be used to provide efficient fault tolerance in numerical linear algebra, and it can be efficiently implemented on modern computing architectures. In particular, GVFA can be very efficiently implemented on architectures with hardware support for fused multiply-add operations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Michael Andreski ◽  
Erica Martin ◽  
Victoria Valentine Brouner ◽  
Sarah Sorum

Elevating the technical role of pharmacy technicians to perform Technician Product Verification (TPV) is one strategy that has shown promise to optimize pharmacy practice models. This is done by better positioning pharmacists to provide clinical care, in line with their education and expertise. TPV permits a Validated Pharmacy Technician, as defined by the Wisconsin Pharmacy Examining Board, to verify the accuracy of a product filled by another technician. The pharmacist maintains responsibility for assessing the clinical appropriateness of the prescription, including drug utilization review, data entry, and patient counseling.  During the study period, 12,891 pharmacist-verified prescriptions (baseline) and 27,447 Validated Pharmacy Technician-verified prescriptions were audited for accuracy. The aggregate verification error rate for pharmacist-verified prescriptions was 0.16% and 0.01% for Validated Pharmacy Technician-verified prescriptions. The mean error rate was significantly less for Validated Pharmacy Technician-verified prescriptions than for pharmacist-verified prescriptions (0.19 ± 0.174 % vs 0.03 ± 0.089 %, p=0.020) (Figure 3). This suggests TPV in the community pharmacy setting maintained patient safety. In this study, Validated Pharmacy Technicians were shown to be more accurate than pharmacists at performing product verification. The ability to delegate the product verification task holds the potential to free up pharmacist time for increased direct patient care. Increasing direct patient care by pharmacists in community pharmacies may have significant implications for improving patient outcomes and pharmacy quality.   Article Type: Original Research


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuraslina Zainal Abidin ◽  
Firdaus Fanny Putera Perdana

Despite rooted from Islamic needs, Halal certification also attracts both Muslims and non-Muslims. In fact, the non-Muslim players are the ones dominating the industry. It is widely known that Halal food chain is quite vulnerable due to complications in maintaining Halal integrity, the necessity to prevent doubtful materials, lack of control of food norms, and the importance to retain high quality. The presence of Halal certification is a form of consumer protection and therefore, the integrity of Halal certification must be carefully monitored. There are some Halal violation cases and this can potentially affect the reputation of the Halal food products. Therefore, it is important to develop a system that integrates a verifiable, open, and safe shared database that is not run by a centralized operator. Blockchain technology is the one that offers such. The study presents a framework for blockchain technology for Halal product verification for manufactured food products. The results are desired to help the food industry players in maintaining a system that can improve the transparency and the integrity of their Halal food chain. The system also intends to ensure the affordability and accessibility of Halal certification for as many industry players as possible as blockchain technology is believed to remove the complications in the certification process and reduce paperwork related cost.


2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. 1598-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN W. MAMBER ◽  
TIM B. MOHR ◽  
CARRIE LEATHERS ◽  
EVELYNE MBANDI ◽  
PHILIP A. BRONSTEIN ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry product samples collected between 2005 and 2017 from RTE-producing establishments for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND (random) and RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK (risk-based) sampling projects were tested for Listeria monocytogenes (Lm). Data for 45,897 ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND samples collected from 3,607 distinct establishments and 112,347 RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK samples collected from 3,283 distinct establishments were analyzed for the presence of Lm. These data were also analyzed based upon the percentages of establishments with positive samples, annual production volume, sanitation control alternatives, geographic location, and season or month of sample collection. Results revealed low occurrence of Lm-positive samples from the random and risk-based sampling projects, with 152 (0.33%) positive samples for ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND and 403 (0.36%) positive samples for RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK. The percentage of positive samples significantly decreased over time, from about 0.7% in 2005 and 2006 to about 0.2% in 2017 (P < 0.05). From 2005 to 2017, 3.9% of establishments sampled under the ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND sampling project had at least one Lm-positive sample. Similarly, 10.0% of establishments sampled under the RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK sampling project had at least one positive sample. Samples positive for Lm were found in all geographic regions in all months. Thus, in 13 years of RTE product sampling in FSIS-regulated establishments (2005 through 2017), <0.4% of samples were positive for Lm in both risk-based and random sampling projects. The low prevalence of Lm in these products suggests that the combination of FSIS policies and industry practices may be effective for controlling Lm contamination. Information obtained from these sampling projects is relevant to the ongoing prevention of foodborne Lm illnesses from RTE meat and poultry products. HIGHLIGHTS


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document