precipitation treatment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Micron ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 103056
Author(s):  
Gen Liu ◽  
Jiwei Geng ◽  
Yugang Li ◽  
Hongping Li ◽  
Mingliang Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Irene Caltran ◽  
Floriana Ayumurti Kukuh ◽  
Louis Cornelis Rietveld ◽  
Sebastiaan Gerard Jozef Heijman

Author(s):  
Cristina Morales-Figueroa ◽  
Alejandra Teutli-Sequeira ◽  
Ivonne Linares-Hernández ◽  
Verónica Martínez-Miranda ◽  
Laura Garduño-Pineda ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 667-674
Author(s):  
Shigeru Sugiyama ◽  
En-Hong Liu ◽  
Kenta Imanishi ◽  
Naohiro Shimoda ◽  
Masahiro Katoh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Kalaitzidou ◽  
Andreas‐Arsenios Nikoletopoulos ◽  
Loukas Bakouros ◽  
Anastasios Zouboulis ◽  
Manassis Mitrakas

The present study aims at comparing the two most promising water treatment technologies for selenium removal. A techno‐economical comparison of Se(IV) uptake between the laboratory synthesized iron oxy hydroxide (FeOOH/2.5) with the highest positive surface density of 3.25 mmol [OH−]/g and adsorption capacity 4.3 μg Se(IV)/mg FeOOH/2.5 at pH 7, and coagulation/precipitation with the use of Fe(III) presenting an uptake capacity 3.2 μg Se(IV)/mg Fe was attempted based on the laboratory scale results. The evaluation showed that coagulation/precipitation treatment appears to be economically advantageous in comparison to adsorption process that was applied in Rapid Small Scale Column Tests (RSSCTs) with the FeOOH/2.5. It must be pointed out that for selection of the optimum removal method, other criteria should also be considered, such as post treatment requirements, water flow, labor cost, and maintenance requirements.


2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 778-782
Author(s):  
Shigeru Sugiyama ◽  
Kenji Wakisaka ◽  
Kenta Imanishi ◽  
Masashi Kurashina ◽  
Naohiro Shimoda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document