evolutionary algorithms
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5500
(FIVE YEARS 1017)

H-INDEX

103
(FIVE YEARS 13)

Author(s):  
Bisan Alsalibi ◽  
Seyedali Mirjalili ◽  
Laith Abualigah ◽  
Rafaa Ismael yahya ◽  
Amir H. Gandomi

Symmetry ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Junhua Ku ◽  
Fei Ming ◽  
Wenyin Gong

In the real-world, symmetry or asymmetry widely exists in various problems. Some of them can be formulated as constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). During the past few years, handling CMOPs by evolutionary algorithms has become more popular. Lots of constrained multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) have been proposed. Whereas different CMOEAs may be more suitable for different CMOPs, it is difficult to choose the best one for a CMOP at hand. In this paper, we propose an ensemble framework of CMOEAs that aims to achieve better versatility on handling diverse CMOPs. In the proposed framework, the hypervolume indicator is used to evaluate the performance of CMOEAs, and a decreasing mechanism is devised to delete the poorly performed CMOEAs and to gradually determine the most suitable CMOEA. A new CMOEA, namely ECMOEA, is developed based on the framework and three state-of-the-art CMOEAs. Experimental results on five benchmarks with totally 52 instances demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. In addition, the superiority of ECMOEA is verified through comparisons to seven state-of-the-art CMOEAs. Moreover, the effectiveness of ECMOEA on the real-world problems is also evaluated for eight instances.


Author(s):  
Prabhujit Mohapatra ◽  
Santanu Roy ◽  
Kedar Nath Das ◽  
Saykat Dutta ◽  
M. Sri Srinivasa Raju

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-644
Author(s):  
RustemAdamovich Shichiyakh ◽  
Olga Yu ◽  
InaraK. Shakhbanova ◽  
ChulpanYa Shafranskaya ◽  
SvetlanaV. Titova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Denis Antipov ◽  
Benjamin Doerr

To gain a better theoretical understanding of how evolutionary algorithms (EAs) cope with plateaus of constant fitness, we propose the n -dimensional \textsc {Plateau} _k function as natural benchmark and analyze how different variants of the (1 + 1)  EA optimize it. The \textsc {Plateau} _k function has a plateau of second-best fitness in a ball of radius k around the optimum. As evolutionary algorithm, we regard the (1 + 1)  EA using an arbitrary unbiased mutation operator. Denoting by \alpha the random number of bits flipped in an application of this operator and assuming that \Pr [\alpha = 1] has at least some small sub-constant value, we show the surprising result that for all constant k \ge 2 , the runtime  T follows a distribution close to the geometric one with success probability equal to the probability to flip between 1 and k bits divided by the size of the plateau. Consequently, the expected runtime is the inverse of this number, and thus only depends on the probability to flip between 1 and k bits, but not on other characteristics of the mutation operator. Our result also implies that the optimal mutation rate for standard bit mutation here is approximately  k/(en) . Our main analysis tool is a combined analysis of the Markov chains on the search point space and on the Hamming level space, an approach that promises to be useful also for other plateau problems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-43
Author(s):  
Benjamin Doerr ◽  
Frank Neumann

The theory of evolutionary computation for discrete search spaces has made significant progress since the early 2010s. This survey summarizes some of the most important recent results in this research area. It discusses fine-grained models of runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms, highlights recent theoretical insights on parameter tuning and parameter control, and summarizes the latest advances for stochastic and dynamic problems. We regard how evolutionary algorithms optimize submodular functions, and we give an overview over the large body of recent results on estimation of distribution algorithms. Finally, we present the state of the art of drift analysis, one of the most powerful analysis technique developed in this field.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 548-554
Author(s):  
Valentin Yakovlevich Afanasyev ◽  
Vladimir Fyodorovich Ukolov ◽  
EkaterinaAlexandrovna Tregubo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document