scholarly journals Extinction vortex dynamics of top predators isolated by urbanization

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Benson ◽  
Peter J. Mahoney ◽  
T. Winston Vickers ◽  
Jeff A. Sikich ◽  
Paul Beier ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Hooker ◽  
A Cañadas ◽  
KD Hyrenbach ◽  
C Corrigan ◽  
JJ Polovina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  


PIERS Online ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-114
Author(s):  
Tamio Endo ◽  
Hong Zhu ◽  
Takahisa Sakurada ◽  
Ajay K. Sarkar ◽  
Masanori Okada ◽  
...  


1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvyn S. Berger




Author(s):  
Brian J. Wilsey

Top predators have effects that can ‘cascade down’ on lower trophic levels. Because of this cascading effect, it matters how many trophic levels are present. Predators are either ‘sit and wait’ or ‘active’. Wolves are top predators in temperate grasslands and can alter species composition of smaller-sized predators, prey, and woody and herbaceous plant species, either through direct effects or indirect effects (‘Ecology of Fear’). In human derived grasslands, invertebrate predators fill a similar ecological role as wolves. Migrating populations of herbivores tend to be more limited by food than non-migratory populations. The phenology and synchrony of births vary among prey species in a way that is consistent with an adaptation to predation. Precocious species have highly synchronous birth dates to satiate predators. Non-precocious species (‘hiders’) have asynchronous births. Results from studies that manipulate both predators and food support the hypothesis that bottom-up and top-down effects interact.



2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler R. Naibert ◽  
Hryhoriy Polshyn ◽  
Rita Garrido-Menacho ◽  
Malcolm Durkin ◽  
Brian Wolin ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 061908
Author(s):  
Ashwin Seetharaman ◽  
Hamed Keramati ◽  
Kollengode Ramanathan ◽  
Matthew E Cove ◽  
Sangho Kim ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document