scholarly journals Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (14) ◽  
pp. 3900-3921
Author(s):  
Xiangfei Hong ◽  
Ke Bo ◽  
Sreenivasan Meyyappan ◽  
Shanbao Tong ◽  
Mingzhou Ding
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangfei Hong ◽  
Ke Bo ◽  
Sreenivasan Meyyapan ◽  
Shanbao Tong ◽  
Mingzhou Ding

AbstractEvent-related potentials (ERPs) are used extensively to investigate the neural mechanisms of attention control and selection. The commonly applied univariate ERP approach, however, has left important questions inadequately answered. Here, we addressed two questions by applying multivariate pattern classification to multichannel ERPs in two spatial-cueing experiments (N = 56 in total): (1) impact of cueing strategies (instructional vs. probabilistic) and (2) neural and behavioral effects of individual differences. Following the cue onset, the decoding accuracy (cue left vs. cue right) began to rise above chance level earlier and remained higher in instructional cueing (∼80 ms) than in probabilistic cueing (∼160 ms), suggesting that unilateral attention focus leads to earlier and more distinct formation of the attentional set. A similar temporal sequence was also found for target-related processing (cued targets vs. uncued targets), suggesting earlier and stronger attention selection under instructional cueing. Across the two experiments, individuals with higher decoding accuracy during ∼460-660 ms post-cue showed higher magnitude of attentional modulation of target-evoked N1 amplitude, suggesting that better formation of anticipatory attentional state leads to better target processing. During target processing, individual difference in decoding accuracy was positively associated with behavioral performance (reaction time), suggesting that stronger selection of task-relevant information leads to better behavioral performance. Taken together, multichannel ERPs combined with machine learning decoding yields new insights into attention control and selection that are not possible with the univariate ERP approach, and along with the univariate ERP approach, provides a more comprehensive methodology to the study of visual spatial attention.


2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 1588-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.P. Kelly ◽  
E.C. Lalor ◽  
C. Finucane ◽  
G. McDarby ◽  
R.B. Reilly

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
Sreenivasan Meyyappan ◽  
Abhijit Rajan ◽  
Jesse Bengson ◽  
George Mangun ◽  
Mingzhou Ding

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.H. de Koning ◽  
J.C. Woestenburg ◽  
M. Elton

Migraineurs with and without aura (MWAs and MWOAs) as well as controls were measured twice with an interval of 7 days. The first session of recordings and tests for migraineurs was held about 7 hours after a migraine attack. We hypothesized that electrophysiological changes in the posterior cerebral cortex related to visual spatial attention are influenced by the level of arousal in migraineurs with aura, and that this varies over the course of time. ERPs related to the active visual attention task manifested significant differences between controls and both types of migraine sufferers for the N200, suggesting a common pathophysiological mechanism for migraineurs. Furthermore, migraineurs without aura (MWOAs) showed a significant enhancement for the N200 at the second session, indicating the relevance of time of measurement within migraine studies. Finally, migraineurs with aura (MWAs) showed significantly enhanced P240 and P300 components at central and parietal cortical sites compared to MWOAs and controls, which seemed to be maintained over both sessions and could be indicative of increased noradrenergic activity in MWAs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1065-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez ◽  
Marcia Grabowecky ◽  
German Palafox ◽  
Satoru Suzuki

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALBERTUS A. WIJERS ◽  
JAN J. LANGE ◽  
GIJSBERTUS MULDER ◽  
LAMBERTUS J. M. MULDER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document