Effect of hyperdry amniotic membrane patches attached over the bony surface of mastoid cavities in canal wall down tympanoplasty

2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 1953-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Shojaku ◽  
Hiromasa Takakura ◽  
Motonori Okabe ◽  
Michiro Fujisaka ◽  
Yukio Watanabe ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (12) ◽  
pp. 1282-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Kanazawa ◽  
Hideo Shojaku ◽  
Motonori Okabe ◽  
Michiro Fujisaka ◽  
Hiromasa Takakura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 1453-1457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Faramarzi ◽  
Reza Kaboodkhani ◽  
Sareh Roosta ◽  
Negar Azarpira ◽  
Mahmood Shishegar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vito Pontillo ◽  
Marialessia Damiani ◽  
Giusi Graziano ◽  
Nicola Quaranta

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the recently proposed SAMEO-ATO framework for middle ear and mastoid surgery, by correlating it with the functional outcome in a large cohort of patients operated for middle ear and mastoid cholesteatoma in a tertiary referral center. Methods We retrospectively included all surgeries for middle ear and mastoid cholesteatoma undergone in our Department between January 2009 and December 2014, by excluding revision surgeries, congenital and petrous bone cholesteatoma. All surgeries were classified according to the SAMEO-ATO framework. The post-operative air bone gap (ABG) was calculated and chosen as benchmark parameter for the correlation analysis. Results 282 consecutive surgeries for middle ear and mastoid cholesteatoma were released in the study period on a total of 273 patients, with a mean age of 41.2 years. All patients were followed for an average period of 55.3 months. 54% of patients underwent M2c mastoidectomy (Canal Wall Down, CWD), while the remaining underwent Canal Wall Up (CWU) procedures, being M1b2a mastoidectomy the most common one (33%). Mean pre-operative and post-operative ABGs were 29.2 and 23.5 dB, with a significant improvement (p < 0.0001). ‘Mastoidectomy’ and ‘Ossicular reconstruction’ parameters of SAMEO-ATO showed significant association with postoperative ABG, with smaller residual gaps for the classes Mx and On, and worse hearing results for M3a and Ox. Conclusion Our results show the utility of SAMEO-ATO framework, and in particular of ‘M’ (Mastoidectomy) and ‘O’ (Ossicular reconstruction) parameters, in predicting the hearing outcome.


1989 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lau ◽  
M. Tos

AbstractTo obtain the best possible results of treatment of acquired cholesteatoma, we made a subdivision of cholesteatoma types into attic and pars tensa cholesteatomas, and subdivided the latter further into tensa retraction cholesteatoma and sinus cholesteatomas. Tensa retraction cholesteatoma is defined as arising from a retraction or perforation of the whole pars tensa, whereas sinus cholesteatoma is defined as arising from a retraction or perforation of the postero-superior part of the tensa. We present the long-term results obtained in tensa retraction cholesteatomas treated with one stage surgery from 1964 to 1980. Median observation time was 9 years, range 2 to 19 years. Sixty-one ears were treated without mastoidectomy, whereas 71 ears had canal wall-up mastoidectomy and 64 ears had canal wall-down mastoidectomy. The total recurrence rate was 13.3 per cent; 17 ears had residual cholesteatoma, and nine ears had recurrent cholesteatoma. The best results were obtained in ears with an intact ossicular chain where mastoidectomy was not performed. In 49 per cent of the cases, the cholesteatoma was confined to the tympanic cavity without reaching the aditus, antrum or mastoid process. About one-third to one-quarter of the ears had tympanoplasty only, with removal of the cholesteatoma through the ear canal.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-285
Author(s):  
Samir Sorour Sorour ◽  
Nasser Nagieb Mohamed ◽  
Magdy M. Abdel Fattah ◽  
Mohammad El-Sayed Abd Elbary ◽  
Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Balk ◽  
David Schwarz ◽  
Philipp Wolber ◽  
Andreas Anagiotos ◽  
Antoniu-Oreste Gostian

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document