Comments on “Adaptive sample size modification in clinical trials: Start small then ask for more?”

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-98
Author(s):  
Maximilian Pilz ◽  
Meinhard Kieser ◽  
Kevin Kunzmann

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Proschan ◽  
Qing Liu ◽  
Sally Hunsberger


2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 971-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Jennison ◽  
Bruce W. Turnbull


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (29) ◽  
pp. 3793-3810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Jennison ◽  
Bruce W. Turnbull


1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 243-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. A. Moussa

AbstractVarious approaches are considered for adjustment of clinical trial size for patient noncompliance. Such approaches either model the effect of noncompliance through comparison of two survival distributions or two simple proportions. Models that allow for variation of noncompliance and event rates between time intervals are also considered. The approach that models the noncompliance adjustment on the basis of survival functions is conservative and hence requires larger sample size. The model to be selected for noncompliance adjustment depends upon available estimates of noncompliance and event rate patterns.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Howells ◽  
S. Gran ◽  
J. R. Chalmers ◽  
B. Stuart ◽  
M. Santer ◽  
...  


1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 859-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. McMahon ◽  
Michael Proschan ◽  
Nancy L. Geller ◽  
Peter H. Stone ◽  
George Sopko




2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 614-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra C. Graf ◽  
Peter Bauer ◽  
Ekkehard Glimm ◽  
Franz Koenig




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document