Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Measurements in Small Mammals

2022 ◽  
pp. 357-375
Author(s):  
Ye-Hyun Kim ◽  
Katrina M. Schrode ◽  
Amanda M. Lauer
Keyword(s):  
Small Mammals ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Brainstem Response

Auditory brainstem response in the lesser scaup, a species of diving duck

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara C. Therrien ◽  
Catherine E. Carr ◽  
Elizabeth F. Brittan-Powell ◽  
Alicia M. Wells-Berlin
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Diving Duck ◽  
Lesser Scaup ◽  
Brainstem Response

A Validation Study of Auditory Brainstem Response(ABR) in ICR Mouse

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
Bin Na Hong ◽  
Tae Guy Park ◽  
Ha Na Hong ◽  
Tong Ho Kang
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Icr Mouse ◽  
Brainstem Response

Effects of Oral Isotretinoin on Human Auditory Brainstem Response

Dermatology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Nikiforidis ◽  
D. Tsambaos ◽  
D. Karamitsos ◽  
C. Koutsojannis ◽  
S. Georgiou
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Oral Isotretinoin

Diagnostic Implications of Stimulus Polarity Effects on the Auditory Brainstem Response

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 072-082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia G. Fowler ◽  
Christopher D. Bauch ◽  
Wayne O. Olsen
Keyword(s):  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
The Other ◽  
Intersubject Variability ◽  
Acoustic Neuromas ◽  
Full Complement ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Polarity Effects ◽  
Click Polarity

The purpose of this study was to determine whether clicks presented in rarefaction or condensation modes produce more accurate diaghostic information. Subjects were 20 consecutive patients who were seen at the Mayo Clinic for unilateral acoustic neuromas. The nontumor ear served as a control to minimize intersubject variability in the latencies. A standard audio logic evaluation was followed by an auditory brainstem response (ABR) test for which the stimuli were rarefaction and condensation clicks. Responses were analyzed for the presence of waves I, III, and V; absolute latencies of waves I, III, and V; interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, and I–V; and interaurallatency difference for wave V. The results indicated that measures from both polarities were similar in this set of patients and that neither click polarity provided diagnostic advantages over the other. Recommendations are to collect ABRs to both click polarities individually to obtain the full complement of waves on which to base the diagnostic impression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document