Error Reduction and Prevention in Surgical Pathology

2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 630-632
Author(s):  
Raouf E. Nakhleh

Abstract Context.—Because of its complex nature, surgical pathology practice is inherently error prone. Currently, there is pressure to reduce errors in medicine, including pathology. Objective.—To review factors that contribute to errors and to discuss error-reduction strategies. Design.—Literature review. Results.—Multiple factors contribute to errors in medicine, including variable input, complexity, inconsistency, tight coupling, human intervention, time constraints, and a hierarchical culture. Strategies that may reduce errors include reducing reliance on memory, improving information access, error-proofing processes, decreasing reliance on vigilance, standardizing tasks and language, reducing the number of handoffs, simplifying processes, adjusting work schedules and environment, providing adequate training, and placing the correct people in the correct jobs. Conclusions.—Surgical pathology is a complex system with ample opportunity for error. Significant error reduction is unlikely to occur without a sustained comprehensive program of quality control and quality assurance. Incremental adoption of information technology and automation along with improved training in patient safety and quality management can help reduce errors.


2008 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raouf E. Nakhleh

Abstract Context.—National patient safety goals and error reduction efforts should be addressed by each surgical pathology laboratory. Objective.—To review issues relevant to patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology in the context of continuous quality improvement. Data Sources.—The literature is reviewed. Conclusions.—Patient safety goals can and should be addressed within the context of a quality improvement plan. Multiple factors that contribute to errors in surgical pathology are discussed. The current literature defines the extent of these problems within specific segments of the test cycle (preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic). Potential solutions are presented that may reduce or avoid errors. In addition, general principles are outlined that enhance the laboratory's ability to successfully and continuously address patient safety and error reduction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Mirski ◽  
Mark H. Bickhard ◽  
David Eck ◽  
Arkadiusz Gut

Abstract There are serious theoretical problems with the free-energy principle model, which are shown in the current article. We discuss the proposed model's inability to account for culturally emergent normativities, and point out the foundational issues that we claim this inability stems from.


1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1027
Author(s):  
Soo Ah Kim ◽  
Kie Hwan Kim ◽  
Byung Hee Lee ◽  
Ah Ra Lee ◽  
Soo Yil Chin ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Spangenberg ◽  
Karl-Friedrich Klein ◽  
Joachim Mannhardt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document