Empirical Methods for Evaluating Properties of Configuration Planning Algorithms

2013 ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lia Susana d. C. Silva-Lopez ◽  
Mathias Broxvall
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Methods ◽  
Planning Algorithms

Semi-empirical methods versus dynamic load testing in piles

Geotecnia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 89-113
Author(s):  
Jean Felix Cabette ◽  
◽  
<br>Heloisa Helena Silva Gonçalves ◽  
<br>Fernando Antônio Marinho ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Load ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Empirical Methods ◽  
Semi Empirical

What is—or, for that Matter, isn’t—‘Experimental’ Semantics?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Jacobson
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Thought Experiments ◽  
Natural Language Semantics ◽  
Empirical Methods ◽  
Language Semantics ◽  
Experimental Semantics

This chapter examines the currently fashionable notion of ‘experimental semantics’, and argues that most work in natural language semantics has always been experimental. The oft-cited dichotomy between ‘theoretical’ (or ‘armchair’) and ‘experimental’ is bogus and should be dropped form the discourse. The same holds for dichotomies like ‘intuition-based’ (or ‘thought experiments’) vs. ‘empirical’ work (and ‘real experiments’). The so-called new ‘empirical’ methods are often nothing more than collecting the large-scale ‘intuitions’ or, doing multiple thought experiments. Of course the use of multiple subjects could well allow for a better experiment than the more traditional single or few subject methodologies. But whether or not this is the case depends entirely on the question at hand. In fact, the chapter considers several multiple-subject studies and shows that the particular methodology in those cases does not necessarily provide important insights, and the chapter argues that some its claimed benefits are incorrect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document