Compact Formulas for Ground Band Energies

Author(s):  
Apolodor Aristotel Raduta
Keyword(s):  
1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 2837-2840 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Partensky ◽  
C. Quesne

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 711-715
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar ◽  
S. Sharma

We examine the collective nuclear structure of light and medium mass (Z = 50–82, N = 82–126) even–even nuclei using valence nucleon pair product (NpNn). We discuss the role of proton–neutron interaction in light mass nuclei and illustrate the variation of observables of collectivity and deformation (i.e., ground band moment of inertia) and B(E2) values with N and NpNn). The plot of these observables against NpNn vividly displays the formation of isotonic multiplets in quadrant I, strong dependence on NpNn in quadrant II and weak constancy with Z in quadrant III is illustrated.


2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 531-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. TRIPATHY ◽  
R. SAHU

The collective bands of the N = Z nucleus 68 Se are studied within our deformed configuration mixing shell model based on Hartree–Fock states. The configuration space consists of the spherical single particle orbits 1p3/2, 0f5/2, 1p1/2 and 0g9/2 with 56 Ni as the inert core. A modified Kuo interaction for this basis space has been used in our calculation. The calculated ground band, K = 2+ excited band and the K = 5- excited band agree reasonably well with the experiment. Our calculation shows that the ground band is essentially of oblate shape and the excited K = 2+ band is of prolate shape. This is in agreement with the conclusions drawn from the recent experimental analysis.


1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 1637-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Bemis ◽  
F. K. McGowan ◽  
J. L. C. Ford ◽  
W. T. Milner ◽  
R. L. Robinson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J. M. Eldridge ◽  
B. Fenker ◽  
C. Goodin ◽  
C. J. Zachary ◽  
J. H. Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ohkubo ◽  
J Takahashi ◽  
Y Yamanaka

Abstract For more than half a century, the structure of $^{12}$C, such as the ground band, has been understood to be well described by the three $\alpha$ cluster model based on a geometrical crystalline picture. On the contrary, recently it has been claimed that the ground state of $^{12}$C is also well described by a nonlocalized cluster model without any of the geometrical configurations originally proposed to explain the dilute gas-like Hoyle state, which is now considered to be a Bose–Einstein condensate of $\alpha$ clusters. The challenging unsolved problem is how we can reconcile the two exclusive $\alpha$ cluster pictures of $^{12}$C, crystalline vs. nonlocalized structure. We show that the crystalline cluster picture and the nonlocalized cluster picture can be reconciled by noticing that they are a manifestation of supersolidity with properties of both crystallinity and superfluidity. This is achieved through a superfluid $\alpha$ cluster model based on effective field theory, which treats the Nambu–Goldstone zero mode rigorously. For several decades, scientists have been searching for a supersolid in nature. Nuclear $\alpha$ cluster structure is considered to be the first confirmed example of a stable supersolid.


1978 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 634-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. W. Yates ◽  
Noah R. Johnson ◽  
L. L. Riedinger ◽  
A. C. Kahler
Keyword(s):  

1973 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 1046-1047
Author(s):  
Akira Hasegawa ◽  
Hiromi Tanaka
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document