Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing and Surgical Techniques in Active Patients with Severe Hip Deformity

2013 ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
Antonio Moroni ◽  
A. Hoang-Kim ◽  
R. Orsini ◽  
G. Micera
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Metal On Metal ◽  
Hip Deformity ◽  
Active Patients

scholarly journals Cost-Utility of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Compared to Conventional Total Hip Replacement in Young Active Patients with Osteoarthritis

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 942-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne Heintzbergen ◽  
Nathalie A. Kulin ◽  
Maarten J. IJzerman ◽  
Lotte M.G. Steuten ◽  
Jason Werle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Metal On Metal ◽  
Active Patients

Long-term results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients 65 years of age or older

2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002092464
Author(s):  
Harlan C Amstutz ◽  
Michel J Le Duff
Keyword(s):  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Metal On Metal ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Active Patients ◽  
Over Time

Background: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MMHRA) is typically used in young and active patients because they have the most to gain from this bone-preserving procedure. However, there is very little long-term data on the performance of MMHRA in patients 65 years of age or older because of the efficacy of conventional total hip arthroplasty in this patient population. Methods: 109 patients (124 hips) age ⩾65 years were treated with Conserve Plus MMHRA. There were 83 male and 26 female patients. Their mean age at surgery was 69.5 (range 65–83) years. UCLA hip scores, SF-12 quality of life score were collected at follow-up visits. Radiographic and survivorship analyses were performed. Results: SF-12 scores and UCLA scores were maintained over time except for a small decrease in activity. 4 patients underwent revision surgery. The 15-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the cohort was 93.7%. All revisions surgeries were successful at a mean follow-up time of 113 (range 30–218) months. Unusual radiographic findings from our previous publication did not progress over time except for 1 hip that showed a complete radiolucency around the acetabular component. Conclusions: Our results clearly show that HRA is a viable prosthetic solution with many advantages for all active patients, regardless of their age at the time of surgery.

Chinese Experience With Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hein Latt Win ◽  
Shuhua Yang ◽  
Hiran K. Wimalaratne ◽  
Xu Weihua ◽  
Ye Shunan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Metal On Metal

scholarly journals Anisotropic bone remodeling of a biomimetic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implant

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Caouette ◽  
M.N. Bureau ◽  
P.-A. Vendittoli ◽  
M. Lavigne ◽  
N. Nuño
Keyword(s):  
Bone Remodeling ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Metal On Metal

Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Same Patient: A Case Series Comparison

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd A. Morrison ◽  
William Macaulay ◽  
Jeffrey A. Geller
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Metal On Metal
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document