Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Sandwich-type Ceramic on Ceramic Liner

Author(s):  
Soo-Ho Lee ◽  
Sung-Kwan Hwang ◽  
B.-K. Kim ◽  
S.-H. Hong
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949901878391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Dong Chang ◽  
In-Sung Kim ◽  
Sameer Ajit Mansukhani ◽  
Vishwas Sharma ◽  
Sang-Soo Lee ◽  
...  

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surfaces. Methods: A total of 52 revision THAs (28 men and 19 women) using the fourth-generation CoC bearing surfaces were retrospectively evaluated. Both acetabular cup and femoral stem were revised in all cases. The mean follow-up period was 7.3 years (range, 4.0–9.9 years). The clinical results with Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and radiologic outcomes were evaluated. Results: At the final follow-up examination, the average HHS was 90.4 (range, 67–100). The average WOMAC pain and physical function score were 2.8 (range, 0–12) and 16.4 (range, 0–42), respectively. Complications were observed in 10 hips (19.2%). However, there were no bearing surface-related complications, and no cases of dislocation and squeaking. Retroacetabular pelvic osteolysis without cup loosening was observed in one hip at the final follow-up. However, no hip showed radiographic signs of cup loosening, vertical or horizontal acetabular cup migrations, and changes of inclinations during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Our data showed that clinical and radiologic outcomes after revision THA using fourth-generation CoC bearing were favorable. Hence, revision THA with the use of CoC bearing surfaces can be preferentially considered. Further studies with long-term follow-up data are warranted.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1231-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Dong Chang ◽  
Rutuj Kamdar ◽  
Je-Hyun Yoo ◽  
Mina Hur ◽  
Sang-Soo Lee

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-459
Author(s):  
Yoshitoshi Higuchi ◽  
Taisuke Seki ◽  
Yasuhiko Takegami ◽  
Yusuke Osawa ◽  
Taiki Kusano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Young-Kyun Lee ◽  
Jae-Young Lim ◽  
Yong-Chan Ha ◽  
Tae-Young Kim ◽  
Woon-Hwa Jung ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1641-1646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitoshi Higuchi ◽  
Yukiharu Hasegawa ◽  
Daigo Komatsu ◽  
Taisuke Seki ◽  
Naoki Ishiguro

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110043
Author(s):  
Antonios A Koutalos ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theofilos Karachalios

Purpose: The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies. Results: 46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document