Classical diffusion theories

1986 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Sih ◽  
J. G. Michopoulos ◽  
S. C. Chou
Keyword(s):  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 1821-1829
Author(s):  
Bedřich Porsch ◽  
Simon King ◽  
Lars-Olof Sundelöf

The differences between the QELSS and classical diffusion coefficient of a polydisperse polymer resulting from distinct definitions of experimentally accessible average values are calculated for two assumed specific forms of molar mass distributions. Predicted deviations are compared with the experiment using NBS 706 standard polystyrene. QELSS Dz of this sample relates within 2-4% to the classical diffusion coefficient, if the Schulz-Zimm molar mass distribution is assumed to be valid. In general, differences between the height-area and QELSS diffusion coefficient of about 20% may be found for Mw/Mn ~ 2, and this value may increase above 35%, if strongly tailing molar mass distribution pertains to the sample.


1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Johnson

Author(s):  
M. V. Basilevsky ◽  
A. I. Voronin

Author(s):  
David Jou ◽  
José Casas-Vázquez ◽  
Georgy Lebon

1932 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 721 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. McKay
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document