Analysis of Angioscotoma Testing with Friedmann Visual Field Analyser and Tübinger Perimeter

Author(s):  
Ryujiro Suzuki ◽  
Masaaki Tomonaga
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-318304
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Murata ◽  
Ryo Asaoka ◽  
Yuri Fujino ◽  
Masato Matsuura ◽  
Kazunori Hirasawa ◽  
...  

Background/aimsWe previously reported that the visual field (VF) prediction model using the variational Bayes linear regression (VBLR) is useful for accurately predicting VF progression in glaucoma (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014, 2018). We constructed a VF measurement algorithm using VBLR, and the purpose of this study was to investigate its usefulness.Method122 eyes of 73 patients with open-angle glaucoma were included in the current study. VF measurement was performed using the currently proposed VBLR programme with AP-7700 perimetry (KOWA). VF measurements were also conducted using the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) standard programme with Humphrey field analyser. VF measurements were performed using the 24–2 test grid. Visual sensitivities, test–retest reproducibility and measurement duration were compared between the two algorithms.ResultMean mean deviation (MD) values with SITA standard were −7.9 and −8.7 dB (first and second measurements), whereas those with VBLR-VF were −8.2 and −8.0 dB, respectively. There were no significant differences across these values. The correlation coefficient of MD values between the 2 algorithms was 0.97 or 0.98. Test–retest reproducibility did not differ between the two algorithms. Mean measurement duration with SITA standard was 6 min and 02 s or 6 min and 00 s (first or second measurement), whereas a significantly shorter duration was associated with VBLR-VF (5 min and 23 s or 5 min and 30 s).ConclusionVBLR-VF reduced test duration while maintaining the same accuracy as the SITA-standard.


1976 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Regan ◽  
P. Varney ◽  
J. Purdy ◽  
N. Kraty

1988 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 174-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Barry Collin ◽  
Christine Han ◽  
Phaik Chin Khor

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000352
Author(s):  
Stephen R Kelly ◽  
Susan R Bryan ◽  
John M Sparrow ◽  
David P Crabb

ObjectiveThis study aimed to demonstrate that large-scale visual field (VF) data can be extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) and to assess the feasibility of calculating metrics from these data that could be used to audit aspects of service delivery of glaucoma care.Method and analysisHumphrey visual field analyser (HFA) data were extracted from Medisoft EMRs from five regionally different clinics in England in November 2015, resulting in 602 439 records from 73 994 people. Target patients were defined as people in glaucoma clinics with measurable and sustained VF loss in at least one eye (HFA mean deviation (MD) outside normal limits ≥2 VFs). Metrics for VF reliability, stage of VF loss at presentation, speed of MD loss, predicted loss of sight years (bilateral VF impairment) and frequency of VFs were calculated.ResultsOne-third of people (34.8%) in the EMRs had measurable and repeatable VF loss and were subject to analyses (n=25 760 patients). Median (IQR) age and presenting MD in these patients were 71 (61, 78) years and −6 (–10, –4) dB, respectively. In 19 264 patients with >4 years follow-up, median (IQR) MD loss was −0.2 (−0.8, 0.3) dB/year and median (IQR) intervals between VF examinations was 11 (8, 16) months. Metrics predicting loss of sight years and reliability of examinations varied between centres (p<0.001).ConclusionThis study illustrates the feasibility of assessing aspects of health service delivery in glaucoma clinics through analysis of VF databases. Proposed metrics could be useful for blindness prevention from glaucoma in secondary care centres.


Author(s):  
Frank Eperjesi ◽  
Hannah Bartlett ◽  
Mark Dunne
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Frank Eperjesi ◽  
Hannah Bartlett ◽  
Mark Dunne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document