Lateral eye movements as indicators of processing strategies in paired-associate learning

1981 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-162
Author(s):  
James B. Onken ◽  
John A. Stern
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Paired Associate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Associate Learning ◽  
Processing Strategies ◽  
Lateral Eye

Two-Stage Paired-Associate Learning and Eye Movements

Science ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 148 (3678) ◽  
pp. 1749-1750 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. McCormack ◽  
E. J. Haltrecht
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Paired Associate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Associate Learning

scholarly journals Monitoring eye movements while studying the effects of response familiarization on paired-associate learning

1968 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 269-270
Author(s):  
T. E. Moore ◽  
P. D. McCormack
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Paired Associate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Associate Learning ◽  
Response Familiarization

The Supposed Effect of Interactive Imagery in Paired Associate Learning

1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 888-900
Author(s):  
Richard N. Wilton ◽  
Patricia Mathieson
Keyword(s):  
Paired Associate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Associate Learning ◽  
Interactive Imagery

Reactivity of Judgments of Learning in a Levels-of-Processing Paradigm

2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eylul Tekin ◽  
Henry L. Roediger
Keyword(s):  
Target Word ◽  
Paired Associate ◽  
Judgments Of Learning ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Levels Of Processing ◽  
Pleasantness Rating ◽  
Associate Learning ◽  
Counting Task ◽  
Reactive Effect ◽  
Target Words

Abstract. Recent studies have shown that judgments of learning (JOLs) are reactive measures in paired-associate learning paradigms. However, evidence is scarce concerning whether JOLs are reactive in other paradigms. In old/new recognition experiments, we investigated the reactivity effects of JOLs in a levels-of-processing (LOP) paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, for each word, subjects saw a yes/no orienting question followed by the target word and a response. Then, they either did or did not make a JOL. The yes/no questions were about target words’ appearances, rhyming properties, or category memberships. In Experiment 3, for each word, subjects gave a pleasantness rating or counted the letter “e ”. Our results revealed that JOLs enhanced recognition across all orienting tasks in Experiments 1 and 2, and for the e-counting task in Experiment 3. This reactive effect was salient for shallow tasks, attenuating – but not eliminating – the LOP effect after making JOLs. We conclude that JOLs are reactive in LOP paradigms and subjects encode words more effectively when providing JOLs.

Age, pacing, and imagery in paired-associate learning.

1976 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J. Treat ◽  
Hayne W. Reese
Keyword(s):  
Paired Associate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Associate Learning

Survival Processing Does Not Improve Paired-Associate Learning

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bennett L. Schwartz ◽  
Brock R. Brothers
Keyword(s):  
Paired Associate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Survival Processing ◽  
Associate Learning
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document