response familiarization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

1978 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 289
Author(s):  
Sarah Sitton ◽  
Vilma Fuentes ◽  
Carolyn Czichos

1966 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 391-392
Author(s):  
D. Gene Davenport ◽  
Donald H. Kausler ◽  
John H. Mueller ◽  
Algimantas A. Norvilas

1965 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Scandura

In each of two experiments 32 Ss were familiarized with a set of stimulus and response nonsense syllables and then learned a list of eight pairs. Each of four familiarity conditions (neither syllable, stimuli, responses, and both syllables) was represented in this list by two pairs, one learned under a repetition condition and the other under a nonrepetition condition. In Exp. 1 the pairs were presented for 2 sec. each; in Exp. 2 presentation was self-paced. The difference between learning under the repetition conditions was shown to be a function of stimulus and response familiarization. The sensitive variables were total errors in Exp. 1 and presentation time (time to learn) in Exp. 2. It was difficult to criticize these findings on the basis of the item-selection artifact usually referred to in studies of this type. The results favor an all-or-none conception of PA learning when the stimuli and responses act as single elements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document