Some results on top-context-free tree languages

Author(s):  
Dieter Hofbauer ◽  
Maria Huber ◽  
Gregory Kucherov
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (47) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost Engelfriet ◽  
Erik Meineche Schmidt

A fixed point characterization of the inside-out (IO) and the outside- in (OI) context-free tree languages is given. This characterization is used to obtain a theory of nondeterministic systems of context-free equations with parameters. Several ''Mezei and Wright like'' results are obtained which relate to context-free tree languages, to recognizable tree languages and to nondeterministic recursive program(scheme)s (called by value and called by name). The emptiness problem and closure properties of the context-free tree languages are discussed. Hierarchies of higher level equational subsets of an algebra are considered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 269 ◽  
pp. 104454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Osterholzer ◽  
Toni Dietze ◽  
Luisa Herrmann

1986 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Kyota Aoki ◽  
Kazumi Matsuura

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (05) ◽  
pp. 523-542
Author(s):  
Markus Teichmann

We show how to train a weighted regular tree grammar such that it best approximates a weighted linear context-free tree grammar concerning the Kullback–Leibler divergence between both grammars. Furthermore, we construct a regular tree grammar that approximates the tree language induced by a context-free tree grammar.


2005 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-96
Author(s):  
P RETY ◽  
J VUOTTO

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 257-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREAS MALETTI ◽  
CĂTĂLIN IONUŢ TÎRNĂUCĂ

The fundamental properties of the class QUASI of quasi-relabeling relations are investigated. A quasi-relabeling relation is a tree relation that is defined by a tree bimorphism (φ, L, ψ), where φ and ψ are quasi-relabeling tree homomorphisms and L is a regular tree language. Such relations admit a canonical representation, which immediately also yields that QUASI is closed under finite union. However, QUASI is not closed under intersection and complement. In addition, many standard relations on trees (e.g., branches, subtrees, v-product, v-quotient, and f-top-catenation) are not quasi-relabeling relations. If quasi-relabeling relations are considered as string relations (by taking the yields of the trees), then every Cartesian product of two context-free string languages is a quasi-relabeling relation. Finally, the connections between quasi-relabeling relations, alphabetic relations, and classes of tree relations defined by several types of top-down tree transducers are presented. These connections yield that quasi-relabeling relations preserve the regular and algebraic tree languages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document