Clinical and functional results after the rehabilitation period in minimally-invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Fuchs ◽  
Bernd Rolauffs ◽  
Thorsten Plaumann ◽  
Carsten O. Tibesku ◽  
Dieter Rosenbaum
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Faour-Martín ◽  
Jose Antonio Valverde-García ◽  
Miguel Ángel Martín-Ferrero ◽  
Aurelio Vega-Castrillo ◽  
María Angeles de la Red Gallego ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
J. Goetz ◽  
M. Baeurle ◽  
S. Dullien ◽  
J. Grifka ◽  
F. Koeck ◽  
...  

Purpose and Hypothesis. Knee osteoarthritis results, inter alia, in decreased postural stability. After arthroplasty, postural stability recovers, but it is unclear whether this can be ascribed to a reduction of pain or to the preserving of receptor-rich intraarticular soft tissue and natural knee kinematics. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an unicondylar knee arthroplasty provides better results regarding postural stability or a patient-specific knee spacer. Methods. In this comparative study, we assessed functional results and postural stability 16 months after 20 unicondylar knee arthroplasties (group A) and 20 patient-specific interpositional knee device implantations (group B). Patients were evaluated using the KSS and WOMAC score. Postural stability was analysed during single leg stance on a force platform (Biodex Balance System). Results. Concerning postural stability, range of motion (ROM), and KSS 16 months after the procedure, there were no significant differences between both groups. Conclusion. Successful treatment of knee osteoarthritis restores postural stability to the level of the contralateral side, regardless of the implant device.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document