Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 390-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Zaffagnini ◽  
Danilo Bruni ◽  
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli ◽  
Tommaso Bonanzinga ◽  
Nicola Lopomo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Single Bundle

scholarly journals Comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized study

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 785-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Stańczak ◽  
Marzenna Zielińska ◽  
Marek Synder ◽  
Marcin Domżalski ◽  
Michał Polguj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Kujala Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objective This prospective randomized study was performed to compare the outcomes of two operative methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on either bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) grafts or hamstring tendon (HT) grafts. Methods Among 100 patients, 96 completed the full follow-up period and were included in the final analysis (48 in the BTB group and 48 in the HT group). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ACL reconstruction. The Kujala score, Tegner score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were among the parameters used to evaluate the patients. Results Both groups were comparable in terms of sex, age, and body mass index. None of the analyzed scores were significantly different between the BTB and HT groups at either the initial or last visit. Both groups demonstrated improvement at the 12-year follow-up according to the Kujala score and most categories of the KOOS. The Tegner activity level score showed significant improvement in the HT but not BTB group. Conclusion Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with BTB and HT grafts show comparable improvement in functional results after 1 year of rehabilitation.

Double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the horizontal femoral position: a prospective, randomized study

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergi Sastre ◽  
Dragos Popescu ◽  
Montserrat Núñez ◽  
Jaume Pomes ◽  
Xavier Tomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Bundle Versus

scholarly journals Double bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better restoration of knee laxity and subjective outcomes than single bundle ACL reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arttu Seppänen ◽  
Piia Suomalainen ◽  
Heini Huhtala ◽  
Heikki Mäenpää ◽  
Tommi Kiekara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Subjective Outcomes

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare arthroscopic single bundle (SB) and double bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in the light of all available randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis of this well-researched topic was performed and subgroup analyses of the medial portal (MP) technique and the transtibial technique (TT) were added as a new idea. The hypothesis was that the DB technique is superior to the SB technique also in subgroup analyses of the MP and TT techniques. Methods Instructions of the PRISMA checklist were followed. Systematic literature search from electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus was performed to find RCTs that compared the SB and DB techniques. Nine outcomes were used to compare these two techniques. Each study was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool and three subgroup analyses (minimum 2-years’ follow-up, TT technique and MP technique) were performed. Results A total of 40 studies were included in this meta-analysis. When analysing all the included studies, the DB technique was superior to the SB technique in KT-1000/2000 evaluation (p < 0.01), IKDC subjective evaluation (p < 0.05), Lysholm scores (p = 0.02), pivot shift (p < 0.01) and IKDC objective evaluation (p = 0.02). Similar results were also found in the subgroup analyses of minimum 2-years’ follow-up and the TT technique. However, there were no differences between the two techniques in a subgroup analysis of the MP technique. Conclusion Generally, DB ACL reconstruction leads to better restoration of knee laxity and subjective outcomes than SB ACL reconstruction. The subgroup analysis of the MP technique revealed that surgeons can achieve equally as good results with both techniques when femoral tunnels are drilled through the medial portal. Level of evidence II.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document