scholarly journals Lateral osteophytes do not represent a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 652-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Hamilton ◽  
Rajan Choudhary ◽  
Cathy Jenkins ◽  
Stephen J. Mellon ◽  
Christopher A. F. Dodd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up

The Knee ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Pearle ◽  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Lily Lee ◽  
Thomas M. Coon ◽  
Todd A. Borus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Lateral and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis progression after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A five- to 10-year follow-up study

The Knee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1135-1142
Author(s):  
Abdulhamit Misir ◽  
Erdal Uzun ◽  
Turan Bilge Kizkapan ◽  
Ali Eray Gunay ◽  
Mustafa Ozcamdalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Osteoarthritis Progression

Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 55Years Old: Minimum of TwoYears of Follow-Up

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debdut Biswas ◽  
Geoffrey S. Van Thiel ◽  
Nathan G. Wetters ◽  
Bryan J. Pack ◽  
Richard A. Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

scholarly journals All-Polyethylene Tibial Component Does Not Affect Survivorship of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at Mid-Term Follow-Up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Gagliardi ◽  
Francesco Zambianchi ◽  
Alois Franz ◽  
Vitantonio Digennaro ◽  
Fabio Catani
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Tibial Component ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

AbstractThe present study's primary aim was to determine the survivorship of a large cohort of patients implanted with a single design all-polyethylene tibial component medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Its secondary purpose was to investigate the reasons underlying implant failure, with specific attention to component positioning and limb alignment. Between 2007 and 2013, 166 patients underwent medial UKA with a single design all-polyethylene tibial component at two centers. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients were administered clinical outcome scores and radiographic information were collected. Postoperative complications and causes of revision were recorded. A total of 140 patients (80 in Center A and 60 in Center B) who underwent all-polyethylene tibial component medial UKA (82 cases in Center A and 60 in Center B) were taken into account. Kaplan–Meier cumulative survivorship of implants was 96.5% (confidence interval [CI]: 91.7–98.6%) at an average follow-up of 61.1 months. Tibial aseptic loosening was accounted for failure in one case, while no correlation was found between implant positioning and failure. Two revisions were performed in Center A and three in Center B. Slight correction of the preoperative varus deformity was performed at both centers. All-polyethylene tibial component UKA provided satisfactory clinical and functional outcome, with excellent survival rate in the early and mid-term follow-up. Continued patient follow-up is needed to determine long-term survivorship of the examined UKA model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document