Bone-on-Bone Contact on Radiograph is not a Prerequisite for Successful Outcome in Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty—A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Introduction Patients without bone-on-bone osteoarthritis are excluded from mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to higher revision rates and poorer outcomes. However, we do not know if the same indication applies to fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty implants. Our study aims to compare functional outcomes and revision rates in patients with and without bone-on-bone arthritis undergoing fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods We reviewed 153 fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in a single institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on joint space remaining measured on preoperative radiographs. Group 1 included knees with bone-on-bone contact; group 2 included knees with less than 2 mm joint space; group 3 included knees with 2 to 4 mm joint space; group 4 included knees with more than 4 mm joint space. Patients were followed up for 10 years postoperatively and assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, the Functional Score and Knee Score from the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey. Results There was no difference in terms of demographic data and preoperative scores. Postoperative Knee Society Functional Score was found to be lower in group 1 as compared with the other groups. There was no difference between the four groups of patients in terms of Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores from the Short Form 36 Health Survey. There was no difference in terms of survivorship free from all-cause revision at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up. Conclusion Symptomatic patients with varying degrees of arthritis on preoperative radiographs had comparable clinical outcomes. We conclude that symptomatic patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of medial compartment osteoarthritis of any grade can benefit from a fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The Medial Tibial Plateau Can Be Used as a Direct Anatomical Reference for the Posterior Tibial Slope in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

There has been no consensus about how to determine the individual posterior tibial slope (PTS) intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tibial plateau could be used as a reference for reproducing individual PTS during medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) data from 48 lower limbs for medial UKA were imported into a three-dimensional planning software. Digitally reconstructed radiographs were created from the CT data as the lateral knee plain radiographs and the radiographic PTS angle was measured. Then, the PTS angles on the medial one-quarter and the center of the MTP (¼ and ½ MTP, respectively), and that on the medial tibial eminence (TE) were measured on the sagittal multiplanar reconstruction image. Finally, 20 lateral knee radiographs with an arthroscopic probe placed on the ¼ and the ½ MTP were obtained intraoperatively, and the angle between the axis of the probe and the tangent line of the plateau was measured. The mean radiographic PTS angle was 7.9 ± 3.0 degrees (range: 1.7–13.6 degrees). The mean PTS angles on the ¼ MTP, the ½ MTP, and the TE were 8.1 ± 3.0 degrees (1.2–13.4 degrees), 9.1 ± 3.0 degrees (1.4–14.7 degrees), and 9.9 ± 3.1 degrees (3.1–15.7 degrees), respectively. The PTS angles on the ¼ MTP and the ½ MTP were strongly correlated with the radiographic PTS angle (r =0.87 and 0.80, respectively, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean angle of the radiographic PTS and the PTS on the TE (p < 0.01). The mean angle between the axis of the probe and the tangent line of the tibial plateau was −0.4 ± 0.9 degrees (−2.3–1.3 degrees) on the ¼ MTP and −0.1 ± 0.7 degrees (−1.5–1.2 degrees) on the ½ MTP, respectively. An area from the medial one-quarter to the center of the MTP could be used as an anatomical reference for the individual PTS.

Functional results and survivorship after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single center experience from Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: Isolated involvement of the medial compartment of the knee in degenerative disease is encountered in about 25% of patients with gonarthrosis. We aim to show that in a well-selected group of such patients, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a good option. OBJECTIVES: Review the functional outcomes of patients undergoing UKA and determine the long-term survivorship of the implants and complications of the procedure. DESIGN: Analytical retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center and tertiary care private hospital in the western region of Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected patients who underwent medial UKAs by the same surgeon between December 1988 and December 2009. The life table approach and the Kaplan-Meier statistical method were used to estimate the survival rate (5–30 years) with revision as the endpoint. Functional outcome scores were determined according to the Knee Society Clinical Rating System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in performance scores for pain, walking, and range of movement. Survivorship of the implants with removal of the implant as the endpoint; post-operative complications. SAMPLE SIZE: 218 implants on 142 patients. RESULTS: The survival rate for UKA was 94.7% at 10 years (95% CI 0.906–0.970), 80.9% at 20 years (95%CI 0.724–0.871), and at 30 years it was 77.8% (95%CI 0.669–0.855) of the total knee arthropathies. The average grand total functional score increased from 61 (maximum 200) at 0 months to above 150 at ≥6 months. CONCLUSION: UKA is a good option for isolated medial compartment gonarthrosis with excellent functional outcome and good survivorship in selected patients. LIMITATION: Single center experience, retrospective. We lost 6.0% of patients during follow-up. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.