scholarly journals Natural language processing of radiology reports to investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence and age distribution of fractures

Author(s):  
Florian Jungmann ◽  
B. Kämpgen ◽  
F. Hahn ◽  
D. Wagner ◽  
P. Mildenberger ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients presenting in hospitals because of emergency conditions decreased. Radiology is thus confronted with the effects of the pandemic. The aim of this study was to use natural language processing (NLP) to automatically analyze the number and distribution of fractures during the pandemic and in the 5 years before the pandemic. Materials and methods We used a pre-trained commercially available NLP engine to automatically categorize 5397 radiological reports of radiographs (hand/wrist, elbow, shoulder, ankle, knee, pelvis/hip) within a 6-week period from March to April in 2015–2020 into “fracture affirmed” or “fracture not affirmed.” The NLP engine achieved an F1 score of 0.81 compared to human annotators. Results In 2020, we found a significant decrease of fractures in general (p < 0.001); the average number of fractures in 2015–2019 was 295, whereas it was 233 in 2020. In children and adolescents (p < 0.001), and in adults up to 65 years (p = 0.006), significantly fewer fractures were reported in 2020. The number of fractures in the elderly did not change (p = 0.15). The number of hand/wrist fractures (p < 0.001) and fractures of the elbow (p < 0.001) was significantly lower in 2020 compared with the average in the years 2015–2019. Conclusion NLP can be used to identify relevant changes in the number of pathologies as shown here for the use case fracture detection. This may trigger root cause analysis and enable automated real-time monitoring in radiology.

CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyi Zheng ◽  
Brian Z. Huang ◽  
Andranik A. Agazaryan ◽  
Beth Creekmur ◽  
Thearis Osuj ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nithin Kolanu ◽  
A Shane Brown ◽  
Amanda Beech ◽  
Jacqueline R. Center ◽  
Christopher P. White

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1194-1201
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Callen ◽  
Sara M. Dupont ◽  
Adi Price ◽  
Ben Laguna ◽  
David McCoy ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pragya A. Dang ◽  
Mannudeep K. Kalra ◽  
Michael A. Blake ◽  
Thomas J. Schultz ◽  
Markus Stout ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babak Afshin-Pour ◽  
Michael Qiu ◽  
Shahrzad Hosseini ◽  
Molly Stewart ◽  
Jan Horsky ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDespite the high morbidity and mortality associated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), discrimination of ARDS from other causes of acute respiratory failure remains challenging, particularly in the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. Delay in ARDS identification prevents lung protective strategies from being initiated and delays clinical trial enrolment and quality improvement interventions. Medical records from 1,263 ICU-admitted, mechanically ventilated patients at Northwell Health were retrospectively examined by a clinical team who assigned each patient a diagnosis of “ARDS” or “non-ARDS” (e.g., pulmonary edema). We then applied an iterative pre-processing and machine learning framework to construct a model that would discriminate ARDS versus non-ARDS, and examined features informative in the patient classification process. Data made available to the model included patient demographics, laboratory test results from before the initiation of mechanical ventilation, and features extracted by natural language processing of radiology reports. The resulting model discriminated well between ARDS and non-ARDS causes of respiratory failure (AUC=0.85, 89% precision at 20% recall), and highlighted features unique among ARDS patients, and among and the subset of ARDS patients who would not recover. Importantly, models built using both clinical notes and laboratory test results out-performed models built using either data source alone, akin to the retrospective clinician-based diagnostic process. This work demonstrates the feasibility of using readily available EHR data to discriminate ARDS patients prospectively in a real-world setting at a critical time in their care and highlights novel patient characteristics indicative of ARDS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document