The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal liver metastases—comparison with CT and liver MRI

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1323-1329 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kong ◽  
C. Jackson ◽  
D. M. Koh ◽  
V. Lewington ◽  
B. Sharma ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S6
Author(s):  
F. Pakzad ◽  
A. Engledow ◽  
S. Rogers ◽  
J.B. Bomanji ◽  
P.J. Ell ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e84
Author(s):  
Rebecca Strengbom ◽  
Josefin Jonsson ◽  
Oskar Hemmingsson ◽  
Jan Axelsson ◽  
Katrine Riklund-Åhlström ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-167
Author(s):  
Kim Sivesgaard ◽  
Lars P Larsen ◽  
Michael Sørensen ◽  
Stine Kramer ◽  
Sven Schlander ◽  
...  

Background Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) can detect extrahepatic disease before local treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Purpose To investigate if whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) added to gadoxetic acid liver MRI could replace FDG-PET/CT for detection of extrahepatic disease in patients with colorectal liver metastases eligible for hepatic local treatment. Material and Methods This health-research-ethics-committee-approved prospective consecutive diagnostic accuracy study with written informed consent analyzed 79 cases included between 29 June 2015 and 7 February 2017. Whole-body MRI covering the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis and FDG-PET/CT including contrast-enhanced CT was performed 0–3 days before local treatment of liver metastases. Whole-body MR images were read independently by two readers. FDG-PET/CT images were read independently by two pairs of readers. Histopathology and follow-up imaging were used as reference standard. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated and compared including noninferiority analysis. Results Seventy-five malignant lesions and 419 benign lesions were confirmed. Sensitivities of both PET/CT reader pairs 1 and 2 (56.7 and 67.9%) and MRI reader 2 (63.0%) were significantly higher than that of MRI reader 1 (42.7) (P<0.04). Specificities of both PET/CT reader pairs 1 and 2 (92.5 and 92.4%) and MRI reader 1 (91.1%) were significantly higher than that of MRI reader 2 (86.3%) ( P < 0.02). Sensitivity of MRI reader 2 was non-inferior compared to PET/CT reader pair 1. Specificities of both MRI readers were non-inferior to both PET/CT reader pairs. Conclusion For detection of extrahepatic disease in patients with colorectal liver metastases, whole-body MRI was non-inferior to FDG-PET/CT for some reader combinations. However, reader-independent non-inferiority could not be demonstrated.


2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 1345-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Muralidharan ◽  
M. Kwok ◽  
S. T. Lee ◽  
L. Lau ◽  
A. M. Scott ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1873-1878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nassim Parvizi ◽  
James M. Franklin ◽  
Daniel R. McGowan ◽  
Eugene J. Teoh ◽  
Kevin M. Bradley ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (1081) ◽  
pp. 20170216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Lopez-Lopez ◽  
Ricardo Robles ◽  
Roberto Brusadin ◽  
Asuncion López Conesa ◽  
Juan Torres ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 2059-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wujian Mao ◽  
Jun Zhou ◽  
He Zhang ◽  
Lin Qiu ◽  
Hui Tan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document