Anatomical study of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with special reference to minimally invasive anterior approach for total hip replacement

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mickaël Ropars ◽  
Xavier Morandi ◽  
Denis Huten ◽  
Hervé Thomazeau ◽  
Eric Berton ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Gala ◽  
Paul R Kim ◽  
Paul E Beaulé

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the natural history of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) neuropraxia in a previously reported cohort of individuals after direct anterior approach (DAA). Methods: 99 patients (107 hips) with LFCN neuropraxia were identified, out of which 82 patients (87 hips) (83.1%) completed functional outcomes questionnaires at mean follow-up of 5.5 years (4.4–6.9 years). 5 patients were excluded from the study due to intra-articular source of pain and/or revision surgery. The total sample was composed of 77 patients (31 total hip replacements and 51 hip resurfacings) and functional outcomes scores were obtained for all patients. Results: At average 5.46-year follow-up, 55 patients (60 hips 73%) still reported symptoms of LFCN neuropraxia but their Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were not inferior to those who had resolution for pain, function and stiffness: p values of 0.716, 0.171, and 0.238, respectively. The mean score on visual analogue scale decreased from 2.32 (SD 2.11) to 1.76 (SD 1.99). 1 patient (1.2%) reported his activities were limited by his symptoms. Conclusion: Although the majority of patients still report symptoms related to LFCN neuropraxia, symptoms do improve over time and there are no functional limitations. Even if LFCN neuropraxia following DAA does not lead to functional limitations, all patients should be made aware in order to alleviate any long-term functional concerns.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Tanabe ◽  
Tomonori Baba ◽  
Yu Ozaki ◽  
Naotake Yanagisawa ◽  
Sammy Banno ◽  
...  

Abstract Background; An incision for total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) is generally made outside of the space between sartorius and tensor fasciae lataea muscles to prevent lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury. Recent anatomical studies have revealed that the LFCN not only courses between the sartorius and tensor fasciae latae muscles, but it also branches radially while distributing in the transverse direction from the sartorius muscle to the tensor fasciae latae muscle. The latter is called the fan type, and studies suggest that damage to the fan type LFCN is unavoidable by conventional fasciotomy. We previously demonstrated that injury to non-fan type LFCN occurred in 28.6% of patients who underwent THA by fasciotomy performed 2 cm away from the intermuscular space. This suggests that the conventional approach also poses a risk of LFCN injury for non-fan type LFCN. LFCN injury is rarely reported in the anterolateral approach (ALA), which involves incision of fascia further away than DAA. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the position of fasciotomy in DAA affects the risk of LFCN injury. Methods; This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. All patients are divided into the fan type and non-fan type using ultrasonography before surgery. Patients with the non-fan type LFCN will be performed by the conventional fasciotomy and the lateral fasciotomy in the order specified in the allocation table created in advance by our clinical trial center. The primary endpoint is the presence of LFCN injury. The secondary endpoints will be assessed based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 3 months after surgery in an outpatient setting using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), and the Forgotten-Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Discussion; We hypothesize that the incidence of LFCN injury due to DAA-THA can be reduced by making the incision further away from where it is typically made in conventional fasciotomy. If our hypothesis is confirmed, it will reduce the disadvantages of DAA, improve patient satisfaction. Trial registration; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000035945.Registered on 20 Feburary 2019.


2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002094845
Author(s):  
Praveen Vasantharao ◽  
David Fenbury ◽  
Riaz Khan ◽  
Daniel Fick ◽  
Stephen Dalgleish ◽  
...  

Background: Direct anterior approach (DAA) to hip replacement is increasingly popular. Despite the well-published benefits of early recovery, the approach can be associated with a number of complications that may be underreported. We aim to report the incidence of some of these complications in a large retrospective case series. Methods: 270 consecutive DAA hip replacements are studied which are performed by a single high-volume hip surgeon from 2013 to 2015, not including the surgeon’s learning curve. Operation and consultation records were screened, and focused questioning via telephone was employed to capture specific complications including dislocations, wound infections, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury and revision surgery. Results: 240 of 270 patients or family were contactable. The mean age and body mass index of the cohort was 66 (range 30–89) years and 27 (range 18–40) kg/m2 respectively. The mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Wound issues were encountered in 24 patients (8.8%). There were 9 dislocations (3%). 27 (10%) patients needed revision surgery in the follow-up period. Reasons for revision included leg-length discrepancies, dislocations, ongoing pain and aseptic loosening. 9 (3.4%) patients had to return to operating theatre for reasons other than revision surgery. Symptoms of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury was reported by 54 patients (21%). Conclusions: While the short-term benefits of DAA have been widely reported, our review shows a relatively high rate of revision surgery. We feel that the enthusiasm for DAA should be tempered until further evidence is available.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1587-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Homma ◽  
Tomonori Baba ◽  
Kei Sano ◽  
Hironori Ochi ◽  
Mikio Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document