Repeated closed reduction attempts of distal radius fractures in the emergency department

Introduction: Distal end radius fractures crush the mechanical foundation of most useful tool, the hand. No other fracture has a such potential to devastate hand function, and no other metaphysis of bone is embraced by more soft tissues. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is one of the standard treatments for management of distal radius fractures, and its modication 'The percutaneous 5 pin technique improves the reliability of xation thus combining the benets of non-invasiveness as in casting and stability achieved is comparable to open reduction and plating. Material and method: This prospective study was done between December 2018 to December 2020 in department of orthopedics, including 60 patients with fracture of distal radius Among them 30 patients subsequently underwent ve pin xation and 30 patients were treated with closed reduction and casting method. Result: Radiological analysis of the data was done using Sarmiento's Modication of Lidstrom Criteria. Activities of daily life (ADL) were examined by using the demerit point system of Gartland and Wereley based on objective and subjective criteria, residual deformity and complications. Radiological parameters were assessed for at the end of 6months. There was signicant difference in all the three parameters i.e, Volar tilt, Radial length, Radial inclination between both groups at the end of 6 months. Closed reduction with ve pinning technique group had shown not only better but also statistically signicant anatomical reduction compared to other groups. Functional outcome was better in patients treated with percutaneous 5 pinning technique. Conclusion: The ve pin technique carries the advantage of early mobilization, DRUJ stability. Radio Ulnar pins and the pins across the fracture site provide enough stability to permit early mobilization leading to less post operative stiffness in joint. Although the study series is small and further research is essential to provide directions for treatment, it is safe to conclude that the ve pin technique is a technically less demanding, lessinvasive and an effective way of treating displaced distal radius fractures without severe articular or metaphyseal comminution

Download Full-text

Analgesia for Adult Distal Radius Fracture Manipulation in the Emergency Department: Demand Valve Nitrous Oxide Compared with Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1177/102490790200900401 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 9 (4) ◽

pp. 181-187 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

PL Goh ◽

SW Lee ◽

SH Goh

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Nitrous Oxide ◽

Distal Radius ◽

Complication Rate ◽

Regional Anaesthesia ◽

Distal Radius Fractures ◽

Patient Acceptance ◽

Procedure Time ◽

Radius Fractures ◽

Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Introduction This study compared demand-valve nitrous oxide (Entonox) with intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) as analgesia in adults with distal radius fractures requiring manipulation and reduction (M&R) in the Emergency Department. Materials and methods All adults presenting to the Emergency Department of Changi General Hospital, Singapore between August to December 2000 with closed distal radius fractures requiring M&R were enrolled. Five parameters were measured: pain perception using visual analogue scale (VAS), patient acceptance, procedure time, complication rate and failed manipulation. Results Of the 67 patients enrolled, 32 received IVRA and 35 received Entonox. The average VAS was 2.2 cm for the IVRA group and 5.8 cm for the Entonox group (p<0.0001). The average procedure time was 25.6 minutes for the IVRA group and 11.1 minutes for the Entonox group (p<0.0001). Twenty-seven IVRA patients (84.4%) and 24 Entonox patients (68.6%) would agree to the same analgesia given similar circumstances (p=0.159). Four patients who received Entonox (11.4%) experienced minor complications, while no complications were noted in the IVRA group (p=0.115). Two patients who received IVRA (6.3%) and 8 patients who received Entonox (22.9%) required more than a single attempt at M&R (p=0.086). Conclusion The use of Entonox, compared to IVRA, was associated with significantly shorter procedure time but significantly higher pain scores, with no significant difference in terms of patient acceptance, complication rate or failed manipulation rate. Entonox is an effective analgesic alternative to IVRA in adult patients requiring M&R for distal radius fractures in the Emergency Department. Its use is ideal in situations where IVRA is unsuitable or contraindicated.

Download Full-text