Meaningless comparison of resection depth between cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 471-472
Author(s):  
Mitsunobu Matsushita ◽  
Akiyoshi Nishio ◽  
Kazuichi Okazaki
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1171-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Suga ◽  
Hiroyoshi Ota ◽  
Nobuyuki Tateiwa ◽  
Akihiro Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (04) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilios Papastergiou ◽  
Konstantina Paraskeva ◽  
Maria Fragaki ◽  
Ioannis Dimas ◽  
Emmanouil Vardas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Cold snare polypectomy is an established method for the resection of small colorectal polyps; however, significant incomplete resection rates still leave room for improvement. We aimed to assess the efficacy of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR), compared with hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR), for nonpedunculated polyps sized 6 – 10 mm. Patients and methods This study was a dual-center, randomized, noninferiority trial. Consecutive adult patients with at least one nonpedunculated polyp sized 6 – 10 mm were enrolled. Eligible polyps were randomized (1:1) to be treated with either CS-EMR or HS-EMR. Both methods involved submucosal injection of a methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution. The primary noninferiority end point was histological eradication evaluated by postpolypectomy biopsies (noninferiority margin – 10 %). Secondary outcomes included occurrence of intraprocedural bleeding, clinically significant postprocedural bleeding, and perforation. Results Among 689 patients screened, 155 patients with 164 eligible polyps were included (CS-EMR n = 83, HS-EMR n = 81). The overall rate of histological complete resection was 92.8 % in the CS-EMR group and 96.3 % in the HS-EMR group (difference 3.5 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] – 4.15 to 11.56), showing noninferiority of CS-EMR compared with HS-EMR. CS-EMR was shown to be noninferior both for polyps measuring 6 – 7 mm (CS-EMR 93.3 %; HS-EMR 100 %; 95 %CI – 7.95 to 21.3) and those of 8 – 10 mm (92.5 % vs. 94.7 %, respectively; 95 %CI – 7.91 to 13.16). Rates of intraprocedural bleeding were similar between the two groups (CS-EMR 3.6 %, HS-EMR 1.2 %; P  = 0.30). No clinically significant postprocedural bleeding or perforation occurred in either group. Conclusions CS-EMR appears to be a valuable modification of the standard cold snare technique, obviating the need to use diathermy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6 – 10 mm.


Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2020-321753
Author(s):  
W Arnout van Hattem ◽  
Neal Shahidi ◽  
Sergei Vosko ◽  
Imogen Hartley ◽  
Kaushali Britto ◽  
...  

ObjectiveLarge (≥20 mm) sessile serrated lesions (L-SSL) are premalignant lesions that require endoscopic removal. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the existing standard of care but carries some risk of adverse events including clinically significant post-EMR bleeding and deep mural injury (DMI). The respective risk-effectiveness ratio of piecemeal cold snare polypectomy (p-CSP) in L-SSL management is not fully known.DesignConsecutive patients referred for L-SSL management were treated by p-CSP from April 2016 to January 2020 or by conventional EMR in the preceding period between July 2008 and March 2016 at four Australian tertiary centres. Surveillance colonoscopies were conducted at 6 months (SC1) and 18 months (SC2). Outcomes on technical success, adverse events and recurrence were documented prospectively and then compared retrospectively between the subsequent time periods.ResultsA total of 562 L-SSL in 474 patients were evaluated of which 156 L-SSL in 121 patients were treated by p-CSP and 406 L-SSL in 353 patients by EMR. Technical success was equal in both periods (100.0% (n=156) vs 99.0% (n=402)). No adverse events occurred in p-CSP, whereas delayed bleeding and DMI were encountered in 5.1% (n=18) and 3.4% (n=12) of L-SSL treated by EMR, respectively. Recurrence rates following p-CSP were similar to EMR at 4.3% (n=4) versus 4.6% (n=14) and 2.0% (n=1) versus 1.2% (n=3) for surveillance colonoscopy (SC)1 and SC2, respectively.ConclusionsIn a historical comparison on the endoscopic management of L-SSL, p-CSP is technically equally efficacious to EMR but virtually eliminates the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation. p-CSP should therefore be considered as the new standard of care for L-SSL treatment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB358-AB359
Author(s):  
Vasilios Papastergiou ◽  
Maria Fragaki ◽  
Ioannis Dimas ◽  
Emmanouil Vardas ◽  
Angeliki Theodoropoulou ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabarinathan Ramanathan ◽  
Pugazhendhi Thangavel ◽  
Ratnakar Kini ◽  
Kani Shaikh Mohamed ◽  
Premkumar Karunakaran ◽  
...  

Study performed surveillance endoscopy in a 23-year-old male patient with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) who underwent right hemicolectomy with ileo-colic anastamosis for ileo-colic intussusception three years back. On evaluation, he found to have multiple upper gastrointestinal and ileal polyps. Subsequently he underwent polypectomies in three sessions by combined standard snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) method without any complication. We present a case report that emphasizes the importance of surveillance and the role of prophylactic polypectomy in patients with PJS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document