Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki-Choul Kim ◽  
Yong-Chan Ha ◽  
Bun-Jung Kang ◽  
Young-Kyun Lee ◽  
Hyung-Min Ji ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 60-66
Author(s):  
Hovakim A. Aleksanyan ◽  
Hamlet A. Chragyan ◽  
Sergey V. Kagramanov ◽  
Nikolay V. Zagorodniy

The aim of the study is to demonstrate, using a clinical example, the possibility of treating a patient with a severe acetabular defect by performing a one-stage revision arthroplasty using an individual design. Materials and methods. A 45-year-old female patient was admitted with complaints of pain, limitation of movement in the right hip joint, and gait disturbance. From anamnesis at the age of 5 years, reconstructive operations of the hip joints were performed. In 1991, CITO performed primary total arthroplasty of the right hip joint with an endoprosthesis from ESKA Implants. In 1998, due to the instability of the acetabular component of the total endoprosthesis of the right hip joint, revision arthroplasty was performed, and the cup was placed with a cement fixation. In 2001, for left-sided dysplastic coxarthrosis, primary total arthroplasty of the left hip joint was performed. In 2012, due to the instability of the total endoprosthesis of the left hip joint, revision arthroplasty was performed using an ESI anti-protrusion ring (ENDOSERVICE) with a cement cup and a Zweimller-type femoral component; the femur defect was repaired using a fresh frozen cortical graft. In October 2019, instability of the total endoprosthesis of the right hip joint was revealed, for which revision endoprosthetics was performed using an individual acetabular component. Results. The HHS index before revision arthroplasty was 21 points, after 1 month after surgery 44 points, after 3 months after surgery 65, after 6 months 82. Quality of life was assessed according to the WOMAC scale: before surgery 73 points, after 1 month after surgery 54 points, after 3 months 31, after 6 months 15 points. At the time of the last consultation, the patient moves with a cane, lameness persists, associated with scar reconstruction and atrophy of the gluteal muscles. Conclusion. The use of individual structures allows to restore the support ability of the lower limb and the function of the hip joint in the case of an extensive defect of the pelvic bones of the pelvic discontinuity type.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. e33
Author(s):  
Michael Archibeck ◽  
Daniel Junick ◽  
Tamara Cummins ◽  
Joshua T. Carothers ◽  
Richard E. White

2001 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 1706-1711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse E. Templeton ◽  
John J. Callaghan ◽  
Devon D. Goetz ◽  
Patrick M. Sullivan ◽  
Richard C. Johnston

2007 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Anderson Engh ◽  
Hiroshi Egawa ◽  
Sarah E Beykirch ◽  
Robert H Hopper ◽  
Charles A Engh

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Götze ◽  
Christian-Dominik Peterlein

Abstract Background The principle of acetabular total hip revision (THR) is based on acetabular reconstruction and restoration of the center of rotation. The use of augmentation in high cranial acetabular defects combined with a cementless revision shell was studied sufficiently. This study aimed to report a case with the use of an augment inside a cementless revision shell as a reverse augmentation technique. Methods We describe the case of an 86-year-old female patient with a massive acetabular defect during second revision for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Two problems occurred: (1) a fixed cemented stem with a nonmodular head size of 33 mm and (2) a high acetabular defect with an elevated rotation center. Results With the distraction technique, allograft filling was used to reconstruct the acetabular defect. A cementless revision shell (REDAPT, Smith and Nephew) with a size of 78 mm was used to stabilize the defect. Locking screws placed cranially and distally were used to stabilize the cup for secondary osseointegration. An augment was placed inside the cup to reconstruct the rotation center. A customized polyethylene liner (outer diameter, 54 mm/inner diameter, 33 mm) was positioned below the augment in the revision cup to reconstruct the center of rotation. An 18-month postoperative X-ray analysis showed a stable construct with full secondary osseointegration. Conclusion This is the first report of an augment used for a reverse technique inside a cementless shell to restore the center of rotation with the use of a customized polyethylene liner. This might be a reliable option for reconstruction of the center of rotation in large cementless revision cups in acetabular Paprosky type III defects. This technical note shows the possibility of using an augment as a reverse technique in a cementless revision cup.


2004 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-110
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Yoshimitsu ◽  
Manabu Kubo ◽  
Masaru Kumagai ◽  
Taketoshi Kanazawa ◽  
Takahiro Okawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document