scholarly journals Congenital absence of lumbosacral articular facet joint associated with conjoined nerve root: a case report

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Yoshioka ◽  
Koichi Sairyo ◽  
Toshinori Sakai ◽  
Natsuo Yasui
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1163-1164
Author(s):  
Duccio Boscherini ◽  
Marco Barbero ◽  
Sylvain Duc ◽  
Marc Chalaron

1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilo M.M. Lopes ◽  
Flavio F. Aesse ◽  
Demetrius Klee Lopes

2021 ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Akram Awadallah

Introduction: Conjoint nerve root is embryological nerve root abnormality mainly affecting lumbosacral region. The atypical roots present primarily as a bifid, conjoined structure originating from a wide area of the dura. The conjoint roots are highly liable to trauma due to their size and attachment to surrounding structures. The effects of compression and entrapment are augmented in the case of having stenosis of the lateral recesses where developmental changes and disc herniations deplete the available reserve space. Conjoined nerve roots are a relatively uncommon finding but are frequently left undiagnosed on preoperative imaging studies. Misinterpretation as sequestered disc can lead to devastating results especially during limited spine approach. Case Report: A 43-year-old male patient presented with low back pain gradually progressing over the last three years. Pain was radiating to his left leg associated with tingling sensation and a mild weakness in his left foot. Clinical examination revealed normal muscle bulk and tone. Strength was full bilaterally except the mild weakness 3/5 on toe dorsiflexion of the left foot. Deep tendon reflexes were 3+ at the left knee and ankle. Plantar responses were flexor. Sensation was intact, and there was no loss of sphincters control or bladder dysfunction. A standard plain lumbosacral MRI was performed. The patient was admitted for L5/S1 discectomy. Surgical intervention was recommended, during the surgery we recognized the huge conjoint root. Adhesiolysis and discectomy was done carefully without causing any serious neural injury to the conjoint root. Clinical surgical outcome was good. Pain and tingling sensation disappeared only paresthesia over the S1 dermatome. Postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged after his neurological improvement on day 7, post operation. However, the patient complained of recurrent pain on follow-up visit and continues being followed-up. Conclusion: The conjoined nerve root anomaly diagnosis is not easy and has several points of significance. If misdiagnosed, it could be incorrectly treated as a case for a herniated disc. Neurosurgeons should consider these anomalies in their differential diagnosis. Cases of conjoined nerve root anomaly may be wrongly managed and result in wrong level of surgery with a poor outcome. Researchers conclude that the correct diagnosis of root anomalies is vital for the patient, any misinterpretation could lead to catastrophic consequences.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (03) ◽  
pp. 215-218
Author(s):  
Kelly Gassie ◽  
Krishnan Ravindran ◽  
Gazanfar Rahmathulla ◽  
H. Gordon Deen

AbstractConjoined nerve roots are an infrequent and uncommon finding, rarely noted preoperatively. The conjoined root anomaly has potential for significant neurological injury during surgery. Preoperative recognition may avert disastrous nerve root injury but requires a high degree of clinical suspicion. We present the case of a 44-year-old patient with left L5/S1 radiculopathy caused by a herniated disc. During surgery we identified a triple conjoined nerve root anatomy. This anatomical variant, to our knowledge, has not been reported in literature. We describe the anatomical findings and surgical implications.


2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Hoon Jeon ◽  
Gu Young Chung ◽  
Nam Su Chung ◽  
Un-Seup Jeoung ◽  
Dong-hyun Lee ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 750-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Mistinova ◽  
Frantisek Valacsai ◽  
Ivan Varga

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 056-058
Author(s):  
Deepti Jindal ◽  
Varun Jindal ◽  
Himanshu Singh ◽  
Swati Gautam ◽  
Ishita Bhojia ◽  
...  

AbstractHypodontia is the congenital absence of less than six teeth because of agenesis. Congenital absence of tooth (hypodontia) from the dental arch, may occur with any tooth, most commonly being third molars, however, absence of permanent mandibular canine is rare. The absence of teeth may be unilateral or bilateral. There are reports showing unilateral occurrence of permanent mandibular canines but agenesis of bilateral mandibular canines is not well documented in the literature and comprehensive review of literature shows paucity of data pertaining to this anomaly. Here we report one such rare case of congenitally missing mandibular permanent canines bilaterally.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 788-789
Author(s):  
Andrew K. Chan ◽  
Rory R. Mayer ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Dean Chou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document