scholarly journals Comparison of annual maximum and peaks-over-threshold methods with automated threshold selection in flood frequency analysis: a case study for Australia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Pan ◽  
Ataur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Threshold Selection ◽  
Peaks Over Threshold

Comparison of Annual Maximum and Peaks Over Threshold Methods with Automated Threshold Selection in Flood Frequency Analysis: A Case Study for Australia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Pan ◽  
Ataur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Threshold Selection ◽  
Peaks Over Threshold ◽  
Design Flood ◽  
Threshold Detection ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Flood frequency analysis (FFA) enables fitting of distribution functions to observed flow data for estimation of flood quantiles. Two main approaches, Annual Maximum (AM) and peaks-over-threshold (POT) are adopted for FFA. POT approach is under-employed due to its complexity and uncertainty associated with the threshold selection and independence criteria for selecting peak flows. This study evaluates the POT and AM approaches using data from 188 gauged stations in south-east Australia. POT approach adopted in this study applies a different average numbers of events per year fitted with Generalised Pareto (GP) distribution with an automated threshold detection method. The POT model extends its parametric approach to Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) and Point Moment Weighted Unbiased (PMWU) method. Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) distribution using L-moment estimator is used for AM approach. It has been found that there is a large difference in design flood estimates between the AM and POT approaches for smaller average recurrence intervals (ARI), with a median difference of 25% for 1.01 year ARI and 5% for 50 and 100 years ARIs.

Pooled flood frequency analysis: a comparison based on peaks-over-threshold and annual maximum series

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabnam Mostofi Zadeh ◽  
Martin Durocher ◽  
Donald H. Burn ◽  
Fahim Ashkar
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Peaks Over Threshold ◽  
Annual Maximum Series

scholarly journals Probable annual floods in a small lowland river estimated with the use of various sets of data

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazimierz Banasik ◽  
Andrzej Byczkowski
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Lowland River ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Peaks Over Threshold ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Statistical Series ◽  
Flood Flows ◽  
Flood Flow

Probable annual floods in a small lowland river estimated with the use of various sets of data The results of estimation of the probable annual flood flows with the use of various sets of data from a small agricultural lowland river are presented. The traditional statistical series are formed from the annual maximum (AM) flows of hydrological years. After examination of the homogeneity of the series, two sets of data were formed (AM1 of 34 elements and AM2 of 40 elements), which differed in the significance level of one of the stationary tests. The other series for flood frequency analysis has been formed by selecting peaks over threshold discharges (POT). A computer program, developed by IMGW (Institute of Hydrology and Water Management), and spreadsheet were applied for frequency analysis with the use of AM series and POT series, respectively. Results of computations with the use of AM1 and AM2 data indicate for nonsignificant differences in probable flood flows, and significant with the probable flood flow estimated with the POT data.

scholarly journals Flood frequency analysis for annual maximum streamflow using a non-stationary GEV model

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 03022
Author(s):  
Shangwen Jiang ◽  
Ling Kang
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Yangtze River ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Additive Models ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
The Yangtze River ◽  
Stationary Model ◽  
Risk Of Failure

Under changing environment, the streamflow series in the Yangtze River have undergone great changes and it has raised widespread concerns. In this study, the annual maximum flow (AMF) series at the Yichang station were used for flood frequency analysis, in which a time varying model was constructed to account for non-stationarity. The generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution was adopted to fit the AMF series, and the Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) framework was applied for parameter estimation. The non-stationary return period and risk of failure were calculated and compared for flood risk assessment between stationary and non-stationary models. The results demonstrated that the flow regime at the Yichang station has changed over time and a decreasing trend was detected in the AMF series. The design flood peak given a return period decreased in the non-stationary model, and the risk of failure is also smaller given a design life, which indicated a safer flood condition in the future compared with the stationary model. The conclusions in this study may contribute to long-term decision making in the Yangtze River basin under non-stationary conditions.

Penggunaan Taburan Pareto Umum dalam Menganalisis Nilai Ekstrim Banjir Menggunakan Siri Aliran Puncak Melebihi Paras

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ani Shabri
Keyword(s):  
Poisson Process ◽  
Pareto Distribution ◽  
Generalized Pareto Distribution ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Peaks Over Threshold ◽  
Heavy Tailed Distributions ◽  
Probability Weighted Moment ◽  
Heavy Tailed

Siri banjir tahunan maksimum (Annual Maximum, AM) merupakan pendekatan yang begitu terkenal dalam analisis frekuensi banjir. Siri puncak melebihi paras (peaks over threshold, POT) telah digunakan sebagai alternatif kepada siri banjir tahunan maksimum. Masalah utama dalam pendekatan POT adalah berkaitan pemilihan paras yang sesuai. Dalam kajian ini, kesan perubahaan paras bagi siri POT ke atas nilai anggaran dikaji. Model POT dengan andaian bahawa bilangan puncak melebihi paras bertabur secara Poisson dan magnitud puncak melebihi paras tertabur secara Pareto Umum (General Pareto Distribution, GPD) dibincangkan. Parameter taburan GPD dianggar menggunakan kaedah kebarangkalian pemberat momen (Probability Weighted Moment, PWM) untuk paras yang diketahui. Perbandingan kesesuaian model POT dan model AM dalam menganggarkan nilai hujung atas taburan dibuat. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa apabila paras siri POT boleh disuaikan oleh taburan Pareto dengan proses Poisson, model POT didapati dapat menghasilkan anggaran nilai hujung atas taburan lebih baik berbanding model aliran maksimum. Kata kunci: Siri puncak melebihi paras, proses poisson, taburan pareto umum, GEV, hujung atas taburan Annual maximum flood series remains the most popular approach to flood frequency analysis. Peaks over threshold series have been used as an alternative to annual maximum series. One specific difficulty of the POT approach is the selection of the threshold level. In this study the effect of raising the threshold of the POT series on heavy-tailed distributions estimation is investigated. The POT model described by the generalized Pareto distribution for peak magnitudes with the Poisson process for the occurrence of peaks is discussed. Estimation of the GPD parameters by the method of probability weighted moment (PWM) is formulated for known thresholds. A comparison of the efficiencies of the POT and AM models in heavy-tailed distributions is made. The result showed that when the threshold of POT series can be fitted by GPD with the Poisson process, the POT model is more efficient than the annual maximum (AM) model in estimating the highest extreme value. Key words: Peaks over threshold, poisson process, pareto distribution, GEV, heavy tailed distributions

scholarly journals Flood Frequency Analysis at the Downstream of Sg. Perak River Basin using Annual Maximum Flow Discharge Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.35) ◽  
pp. 709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munir Snu ◽  
Sidek L.M ◽  
Haron Sh ◽  
Noh Ns.M ◽  
Basri H ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Maximum Flow ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Annual Maximum ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Flow Discharge

The recent flood event occurred in 2014 had caused disaster in Perak and Sungai Perak is the main river of Perak which is a major natural drainage system within the state. The aim of this paper is to determine the expected discharge to return period downstream for Sg. Perak River Basin in Perak by using annual maximum flow data. Flood frequency analysis is a technique to assume the flow values corresponding to specific return periods or probabilities along the river at a different site. The method involves the observed annual maximum flow discharge data to calculate statistical information such as standard deviations, mean, sum, skewness and recurrence intervals. The flood frequency analysis for Sg. Perak River Basin was used Log Pearson Type-III probability distribution method. The annual maximum peak flow series data varying over period 1961 to 2016. The probability distribution function was applied to return periods (T) where T values are 2years, 5years, 10years, 25years, 50years, and 100years generally used in flood forecasting. Flood frequency curves are plotted after the choosing the best fits probability distribution for annual peak maximum data. The results for flood frequency analysis shows that Sg. Perak at Jambatan Iskandar much higher inflow discharge  which is 3714.45m3/s at the 100years return period compare to Sg. Plus at Kg Lintang and Sg. Kinta at Weir G. With this, the 100years peak flow at Sg Perak river mouth is estimated to be in the range of 4,000 m3/s. Overall, the analysis relates the expected flow discharge to return period for all tributaries of Sg. Perak River Basin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document